-
Notice regarding image hosts and attachments. See here.
Starwars viewing order?
- Thread starter n30_mkii
- Start date
My parents think Star Wars is fantastic
:/
1 is quite easily the worst film of the 6
So wrong your off the wrong scale
Soldato
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 9,833
- Location
- Welsh Wales
4,5,6 and repeat 1,2,3 didn't do it for me. I still love the original trilogy, and I am a touch over 35 
1,2,3 didn't do it for me. I still love the original trilogy, and I am a touch over 35 weird, I thought it was a matter of preference. guess not.
Soldato
- Joined
- 15 Aug 2007
- Posts
- 15,788
- Location
- Outside in the bushes
1,2 & 3 Aren't even worth considering IMHO 4,5 & 6 were amazing Films!
Well of course it is, I have simply never, ever seen anyone show any kind of preference towards the first one over any of the others, so I was a little surprised to see it
I liked the first one - I couldn't stand the story on the second and the third was just godawful.
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
My parents think Star Wars is fantastic
As does my 60 year old father.
Does he however wet his pants and go in a psychopathic rant about Jar Jar binks?
No he doesnt.
reverance-Pronunciation:
\ˈrev-rən(t)s, ˈre-və-; ˈre-vərn(t)s\
Function:
noun
Etymology:
Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin reverentia, from reverent-, reverens respectful, reverent
Date:
14th century
1: honor or respect felt or shown : deference; especially : profound adoring awed respect2: a gesture of respect (as a bow)3: the state of being revered4: one held in reverence —used as a title for a clergyman
No, i dont thin.................... no i KNOW I'm not wrong.
4,5,6 then maybe :-
1 had the best light saber fight, but it also had the kid, the pod race and jarjar. So its pretty bad. Solution, watch the last 30 mins.
2 at least had a decent battle scene, yet had Lucas' poor attempts at a romantic story. That puts it at not bad but not good.
3 had the NOOOO bit that made me laugh more than anything else. They should have devoted more time to the anakin into Vader transformation tbh. Its ok, better than 2.
1 had the best light saber fight, but it also had the kid, the pod race and jarjar. So its pretty bad. Solution, watch the last 30 mins.
2 at least had a decent battle scene, yet had Lucas' poor attempts at a romantic story. That puts it at not bad but not good.
3 had the NOOOO bit that made me laugh more than anything else. They should have devoted more time to the anakin into Vader transformation tbh. Its ok, better than 2.
Associate
- Joined
- 26 Sep 2006
- Posts
- 1,945
- Location
- West Bridgford
456123 - make sure you watch the original version of 4. Others are less important which version you watch.
Could people 'star out' the spoilers, remember this guy hasn't watched them yet!
Could people 'star out' the spoilers, remember this guy hasn't watched them yet!
Pah, the reason "they" never made 1,2,3 back in the day was because there were never any plans too back then. I don't buy all of George's rhetoric for a second. What happened was he realised there was a boatload more cash to be made from the star wars franchise, invented this story about how he had always planned to make the prequels and then raped my childhood memorys like a dune raider would a moisture farmers daughter. HAH, RIGHT!
Who me, bitter?
- Joined
- 2 Aug 2005
- Posts
- 8,720
- Location
- Cleveland, Ohio, USA
You forgot to include the Holiday Special betwixt 4 and 5.1, 2, Clone Wars, 3, 4, 5, 6
In one sitting...
EDIT: That would be a very rough sitting. At more than 35 hours worth of watching you'd best hope you were seated at a commode.
You forgot to include the Holiday Special betwixt 4 and 5.
Oh dear god, don't get me started on that travesty! You also forgot the ewoks movie.
Lol. Makes me think of this.
Brilliant episode, spaced rocked