Stereo vs 2.1 system.

Pro Audio and all music is written and produced to be re-played on a 2-speaker setup.

Each speaker having a MID-BASS speaker and a tweeter

If you check out Pro audio Monitors etc, these have just the all rounder and a tweeter.

So, I would say that a 2.1 setup might be more fun for oyu and as people say, Movies or games withj big bangs etc, for decent music, its a no-no.
If you look at decent pro-sound setups, they use a seperate stack of subs.

So for music 2.1 is fine. Especially if the music has sound below 50Hz (classical, dubstep, D&B, etc) which even floorstanders struggle with.
 
If you look at decent pro-sound setups, they use a seperate stack of subs.

WHAT?

Are you talking for live Music? If so, what the hell does it have to do with whether 2.0 is any better than 2.1 in a PC setup?

And if not, then, again... what the hell does that have to do with 2.0 v 2.1 in a PC setup?

If indeed you are talking about live, you will find that there may often be seperate subs, but you will often find that each speaker may be assigned to a specific instrument, or task, and therefore, has absolutely nothing to do with the OP either.

So for music 2.1 is fine. Especially if the music has sound below 50Hz (classical, dubstep, D&B, etc) which even floorstanders struggle with.

I never said that 2.1 is not fine. I merely pointed out that in a studio, producers use a pair of speakers, each speaker being a simple Mid-Bass woofer and high Tweeter and that Music would be closer to what he producer wanted the listener to experience wit ha simple 2 speaker setup than they would get with a 2.1 Setup.

For cheap setups, lets say under a ton ( with a fair few exceptions ) they would probably benefit from a sub or two, but for higher quality, this is not necessarily so.
 
WHAT?

Are you talking for live Music? If so, what the hell does it have to do with whether 2.0 is any better than 2.1 in a PC setup?
Yep, when you said "pro-audio" I assumed you were talking about sound systems in clubs, but now I've read it again, I guess you were talking about recording studios where nearfield monitors are the order of the day. :o

The thing is with 2.0 vs 2.1 is that each has thier advantages and disadvantages... Adding a sub solves some problems but causes others. The sub really needs a DSP to do time alignment with the mains. So really neither is better, but I would go as far as to say for some sorts of music (rock and house) 2.0 is probably the better option, but with bass heavy music you really need a sub to get anything below 80Hz at good SPL levels.

Regardless, this is what I'd choose for my computer speaker setup - 20Hz-20Khz all the way :D
2020qv7.jpg
 
^^

Haha, sitting at your desk wouldn't exactly be the ideal listening position for that setup.

Behind the speakers :D
 
Back
Top Bottom