Stonehenge camping

Soldato
Joined
6 May 2009
Posts
20,369
Is it possible to turn up at places like Stonehenge and camp? Not at campsites as the nearest is 2.2 miles away, I mean just set up a tent and sleeping bag on the 'surrounding land is owned by the National Trust'

I don't really see the point in campsites unless you want/need a toilet and shower
 
No. Only in Scotland can you pretty much just turn up and drop a tent. In England you need a campsite/landowner's permission.
 
You need permission from a Druid, I am a Druid, I give you my permission. If anyone asks you just say doofer from the Internet said it was OK.
 
If there is enough land then why is it not possible to pitch up anywhere? The only way I could see it being bad would be if rubbish was left

We have camped at the Lake district before no on campsites and in woods years ago when younger
 
[TW]Fox;28207588 said:
Because the land belongs to somebody else who doesn't want people camping there?

Do these people wonder the plains making sure nobody is camping on their land? Are you allowed to walk on this private land or is that classed as trespassing?
 
If there is enough land then why is it not possible to pitch up anywhere? The only way I could see it being bad would be if rubbish was left

r

The stones were heavily vandalised when you used to be able to get near them.

People can't be trusted not to wreck anything without rules.
 
Do these people wonder the plains making sure nobody is camping on their land? Are you allowed to walk on this private land or is that classed as trespassing?

Give it a whirl - go into your next door neighbour's garden, pitch your tent and see what happens. The same thing will happen to you if a landowner, farmer or anyone else comes across you on their land.
 
Give it a whirl - go into your next door neighbour's garden, pitch your tent and see what happens. The same thing will happen to you if a landowner, farmer or anyone else comes across you on their land.

What so you cannot walk on land around stonehenge or lake district, peak district etc without being chased off? I'm been to the peak district a few times and never been chased off by the land owner!
 
The stones were heavily vandalised when you used to be able to get near them.

People can't be trusted not to wreck anything without rules.

Can't you get near the stones now?...

29D41D1A00000578-3133182-image-a-27_1434874329910.jpg
 
Some places (such as the lake district) you can wild camp within reason, although technically you need permission first it is tolerated as long as guidelines are followed to cause minimum disruption.

Just sayin
 
What so you cannot walk on land around stonehenge or lake district, peak district etc without being chased off? I'm been to the peak district a few times and never been chased off by the land owner!

Having a right of way to walk over it and being able to pitch a tent for the night are two completely different things.

You can walk along a pavement, try pitching a tent on it without being moved on by police..
 
What so you cannot walk on land around stonehenge or lake district, peak district etc without being chased off? I'm been to the peak district a few times and never been chased off by the land owner!

Well, unless you've been living under a rock, taking bad drugs and/or trolling you'd also know that the lake and peak district are national parks. Go look things up yourself if you're actually bothered.
 
There's a quite simple distinction between access where you walk across it, etc, vs camping, no? Are you playing dumb/trolling? No one's this simple, are they?

No there isn't! e.g. I could walk to a place with a chair and sit there all day with a portable stove then leave at midnight night having left a mess.

Or I could turn up with a small tent at night, wake up in the morning and start my walk.

Are there specific laws that say you can place a chair somewhere but not a tent. How about sleeping in a chair but not a tent?

Some places (such as the lake district) you can wild camp within reason, although technically you need permission first it is tolerated as long as guidelines are followed to cause minimum disruption.

Just sayin

Thank-you, a sensible answer more like what I was looking for
 
Back
Top Bottom