• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** Stunning COD Advanced Warfare Benchmarks ***

Caporegime
Joined
24 Sep 2008
Posts
38,284
Location
Essex innit!












Another win for Team Green but no SLI or Crossfire profiles by the looks of things. My mate has got it and said there is no dedicated servers and it feels a little meh but could be worth a look for those who enjoy online shooters :)
 
Any word on FOV, fps caps in MP?
tempted to get this to mess about with for a few hours.

Pef is shocking at 1600 though, settings need dialing down. Who runs these bloody high settings?
 
Any word on FOV, fps caps in MP?
tempted to get this to mess about with for a few hours.

Pef is shocking at 1600 though, settings need dialing down. Who runs these bloody high settings?

FOV max 90 and fps locked at 90 also. Last cod I played and enjoyed was 4 since then it's gone down hill to me. Was watching jackfrags stream last night and the game looks rubbish... It did look like it performs nice though.
 
FOV max 90 and fps locked at 90 also. Last cod I played and enjoyed was 4 since then it's gone down hill to me. Was watching jackfrags stream last night and the game looks rubbish... It did look like it performs nice though.

Won't be buying then, limited to 90fps and only 90fov will do me in, most FPS games I run 100-110. No frame locks, bah :(
back to FF14
 
Where's this 512bit bus advantage that people keep saying the 290X has at higher res? ..

GTX 980 seems to be consistently ahead at higher resolutions. I guess people need to tell themselves something to make them good about their 290/290X cards :p
 
Where's this 512bit bus advantage that people keep saying the 290X has at higher res? ..

GTX 980 seems to be consistently ahead at higher resolutions. I guess people need to tell themselves something to make them good about their 290/290X cards :p

The money left in their wallets speaks for itself.
 
The money left in their wallets speaks for itself.

GTX 970 at £250 beating the 290X at 4K :p

Weren't 290X's like £450 at launch? Don't they still sell around £275 - £300 :eek:

Can't wait until AMD launch something new, Maxwell is way more efficient than the current GCN arch. Hopefully 20nm with HBM and AMD will pull ahead again, HBM should lower power consumption as well.
 
Where's this 512bit bus advantage that people keep saying the 290X has at higher res? ..

GTX 980 seems to be consistently ahead at higher resolutions. I guess people need to tell themselves something to make them good about their 290/290X cards :p

Wait for more benchmarks before jumping on that.. One thing I have learned is never trust a single source for information..

Infact I tend to use this forum as a more accurate results of how a game performs on AMD or nvidia before these no mark sites.
 
The money left in their wallets speaks for itself.

Errrr less money because the stock 290x's cost more run like jet engines and are power hungry horses?

In truth the 970/980 dominate ati in nearly all games because ati have not released anything in along time and the only thing that they are apprantly going to release in the coming 4 months is a 8gb 290x which is pointless as that is not what is bottlenecking 4k rez. (dont get me wrong it will help but more raw gpu power is what is needed not more ramming ram's)
 

A quick play on the SP and this is quite good fun. Graphically, I am pretty blown away and ran this with max settings and 2 x supersampling. I was getting roughly 60-80 fps.

Watch on youtube with 1080P and 60 fps for the best results (in Chrome).
 
** Deleted quote removed ** - DirtyJester

I concur and nice results, thanks.

6Dx4itX.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom