Well yeah, but that's not people complaining for the sake of it most of the time, you can see why those incidents might upset a few people, which is different to what his first post implied.
[TW]Fox;10389130 said:Seems an expensive waste of time given the limited exposure it will get and the increased delivery costs.
[TW]Fox;10389202 said:This advert shows us that.. the new Impreza looks cack and holds the road.
Think it should read
"The new Impreza, like dog turd on your shoe"![]()
If the bottom ones are fake, how to they get the top ones off?
[TW]Fox;10389130 said:Seems an expensive waste of time given the limited exposure it will get and the increased delivery costs.
Or if one fell on the children?But what about the carbon emissions?!1!?>11/

Missed the point? Here you are sitting on the internet saying a single transporter will reach a limited audience, whilst also looking at a picture of it distributed on the internet.It would catch some attention from people but only one transporter? Bit of a lame advertising campain if you ask me.