Super-storage - 4x drives in RAID 0 array

Soldato
Joined
11 Jun 2003
Posts
5,148
Location
Sheffield, UK
Anyone any opinions on how decent the following storage box would be?

1x SiI3726 port multiplier (basically does all the raid logic away from the system its plugged into. Its has 5x internal sata plugs and can do raid 0,1 and 5) ~£40

1x SiI3132 SATA2 (the card that can talk to the port multiplier - in this case a PCI-e based card) ~£40

1x eSATA cable (single external SATA cable) ~£15

4x SATA drive of choice. 80GB drives from B-grade = £80 total

1x Box to house and cool the drives (can be done on the cheap with an ATX rigged to work like an AT PSU) = £20

Now that isnt cheap for only 320GB storage but...

With the above box you would have 4x 60MB (average max transfer from single drive, more like 75ish with a raptor). At lowest speed your still looking at around 20MB per drive at least.

You would have a sustained transfer graph from HDtach with SUSTAINED transfer starting at around 200MB/second (max of the 4 drives). With it being attached to a PCI-e card you have a bus that unless i've mis-read something would handle that sort of data throughput. The transfer graph would drop off to around 80MB/second but thats still faster than single raptor.

Seek times WOULD suffer but the basic setup and running would be awesome. The above is assuming raid 0 which is incredably risky but for the sake of scratch pad (cad software) use wouldnt be a huge problem. If you were being really anal about it you could even have another port multiplier box attached and run the 2 banks of drive arrays in a raid 0+1.

Im thinking about this more and more - unlikely to be something ill ever do but id love someone to have requirements for the sort of throughput this could handle so I could test it.
 
RAID10 is better than RAID01 in terms of surviving drive failures :)

And a storage server in RAID0 - as you say, that's crazy :D

RAID1 for simplicity baby :cool:

If you want a scratch pad then 2 74Gb Raptors in RAID0 is probably a much better alternative I reckon.

But if you want storage, RAID1/RAID01/RAID10/RAID5 some high-capacity disks and you're all set. Mmmm :D
 
Beansprout said:
RAID10 is better than RAID01 in terms of surviving drive failures :)

And a storage server in RAID0 - as you say, that's crazy :D

RAID1 for simplicity baby :cool:

If you want a scratch pad then 2 74Gb Raptors in RAID0 is probably a much better alternative I reckon.

But if you want storage, RAID1/RAID01/RAID10/RAID5 some high-capacity disks and you're all set. Mmmm :D

True on the redundancy part of the raid - I was considering this more for sustained transfer performance - if I was going to this level to build a storage box id want speed. I've lived through 3 raid 0 setups in random boxes. Raid 10 or 0+1 (agreed on 10 being a more elegant way of doing it) would be good if you wanted reliable + high sustained but this would be cool for housing games install for fast level loads etc. Computer performance in general would feel faster (with a very,very slight lag after asking for something due to having to sync 4 drives for the transfer).

Considering even dual raptors can only pull in around 145MB/sec for the pair (very rough estimate) this gives it a fair bit more poke. As you add drives you get higher transfer up to the 300MB/sec maximum of the SATA2 bus.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom