Lightning struck a tree. Some 10 meters away was a cow. Did EMP kill the cow? Yes, if a conclusion is only from observation combined with speculation. Science explains it differently.A lightning strike can not be stopped if close enough due to EMP (Electromagnetic pulse)
Lightning is a connection from the cloud to distant earthborne charges. An electrically shortest path is down a tree. And maybe kilometers through earth to those distant charges. Also in that path was the cow. That lightning current traveled up the cow's hind legs. And back to earth on it fore legs.
Speculation with only observation assumes EMP killed the cow. Reality: that cow was struck directly.
Electronics are often damaged by a similar event. Then some assume EMP. A lightning strike outside to earth can find destructive path via household appliances. Similar to how the cow was killed. Underground wires are but another path that lightning uses to enter and damage household appliances.
Speculation says EMP killed the cow. Speculation also blames EMP for electronics damage. Science (as demonstrated by previous numbers and the neon glow lamp) says EMP cannot do that damage.
Underground wires (ie Virgin Media) are another incoming path for a destructive surge. Adjacent protectors do not even claim to protect from that type of surge. A properly earthed protector does.
Unfortunately many also assume a protector stops a surge. None do. Then when damage occurs, many further assume nothing can protect from lightning. Or assume EMP. Protection from direct lightning strikes is routine. So routine that surge damage is often considered a human mistake. In part because all this is so layman simple.
Any protector that would stop a surge is protecting from a transient that was trivial. A protector to stop a surge is an advertising gimmick. Effective protection from lightning has been routine for over 100 years. Has always been about earthing BEFORE a surge can enter the building. And by doing nothing to protect from EMP.
Last edited: