Nothings changed then. I never used to get any signal in BDP after they shut down the cell connected to the BDP switch. Even being close to Eagleswood didnlt help.
Yep. I'm over in Aztec now, PG wasn't too bad but over here it's terrible
Nothings changed then. I never used to get any signal in BDP after they shut down the cell connected to the BDP switch. Even being close to Eagleswood didnlt help.
Ah cool. No matter here as I got the S3 back at launch.
Someone I know is looking at the S3 but was asking about 4G version. TBH I said it probably is not worth it just now. Coverage will be patchy, costs higher, battery life impacted and why would the average user really need that kind of speed over and above the 3-6MB you can get on 3G??
Is 4G REALLY that big of a deal in the UK just now in comparison to 3G FOR THE AVERAGE USER?
Who here genuinely NEEDS 4G and why? (genuine question)
Ah cool. No matter here as I got the S3 back at launch.
Someone I know is looking at the S3 but was asking about 4G version. TBH I said it probably is not worth it just now. Coverage will be patchy, costs higher, battery life impacted and why would the average user really need that kind of speed over and above the 3-6MB you can get on 3G??
Is 4G REALLY that big of a deal in the UK just now in comparison to 3G FOR THE AVERAGE USER?
Who here genuinely NEEDS 4G and why? (genuine question)
It's a big deal for us in the countryside, a massive deal.
I have the choice between 3g with one bar and with 60% Coverage of any signal where I go
or
No 3g and 90% signal coverage
I choose 3g
It's not the speed of 4g its the coverage. Even 3g is about 3-4 times speed of our home broadband
3G coverage and 2G coverage are not linked that way AFAIK. You could have crap 3G but, assuming the 2G was great before 3G was added to the area, this does not affect 2G coverage i.e. it will still be great.
It's 2 separate signals effectively. Voice calls and SMS are routed over the 2G network, only data is routed over 3G. The phone SHOULD basically see them as different signals hence why it has 2 readouts - the standard signal bars for 2G and the G/3G/H/H+ etc for the data network (G is actually 2G, the other 3 are 3G).
Most phones are designed (via the software it is running) to drop back to 2G when in standby to lower power usage and extend battery life. If you keep an eye on the 3G signal indicator, it should jump back up to the H/H+ when you start to use the data connection IF the 3G signal is strong enough of course.
That is another aspect of 4G - Will the extra battery usage it uses over 3G be balanced out by the less time it needs to transfer the same amount of data e.g. 1 min of 4G takes 5 mins of 3G for same data, will the battery impact be the same? Or, for the people that need 4G (people who's job has them out in the field a lot and remote logging in etc), will they have to carry chargers and batteries with them?
I get that (I live in the country as well) but, given you live in the country, it may not be until the end of 2013 (70% coverage) or into 2014 (98% coverage by end) before you get LTE coverage anyway. Oh and that is % population, not % geographical area so you may still not have great LTE coverage
Can you explain this bit some more? -
You connect to 3G and get 1bar with 60% coverage of any signal. Do I assume this means 2G as well (voice/SMS signal)? but if you connect to just plain 2G then you have better coverage?
3G coverage and 2G coverage are not linked that way AFAIK. You could have crap 3G but, assuming the 2G was great before 3G was added to the area, this does not affect 2G coverage i.e. it will still be great.