I want to know whether any actual studies have been done into the claims that people can't survive on benefits and NEED food banks. If there aren't these studies, why not.
you mean like studies on the spending habits of benefits whallahs
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/112...foodbanks-buy-cigarettes-instead-of-food.html
you are probably right in thinking that pointing out that some spend a decent chunk on 'fags etc..' is taboo... it does get a mention though:
Smoking in particular is worth focussing on here, not least because the Feeding Britain report offers this thought:
“A family earning £21,000 a year, for example, where both parents smoke 20 cigarettes a day will spend a quarter of their income on tobacco. Even if people buy illicit tobacco they will still spend 15% of their total income on tobacco. Budgeting support is terribly important, but budgetary support alone is often not enough to equip families to kick their addictive habits when addiction is being fed and defended by some very powerful lobbies.”
Read that again. Some poor families may be spending a quarter of their income on tobacco. A quarter.
That figure is actually even higher than an estimate produced last year by the Institute for Economic Affairs last year, which said that the average smoker from the poorest fifth of households spends between 18 and 22 per cent of their disposable income on cigarettes.
Last edited: