temp monitoring...strange

tomanders91 · 12 Nov 2007 at 18:25

I was told that coretemp is the one to use, and that speedfan isnt reliable and is usually 15c more than what it actually says, but for me, coretemp, speedfan, bios, easytune5 (gigabyte software on driver disc) all show the same temperture, and im really not sure what to do believe? Should i just add on 15 to get more reliable tempertures?

naudiz · 12 Nov 2007 at 18:28

Try using TAT as well, thats reliable for me, but I'm in the same boat as you, all mine say the same temps, so I take it they're right

Naud

jabski · 12 Nov 2007 at 18:31

try everest aswell whilst your there

tomanders91 · 12 Nov 2007 at 18:34

naudiz said:
Try using TAT as well, thats reliable for me, but I'm in the same boat as you, all mine say the same temps, so I take it they're right

Naud

tat doesnt work for me, ill give everest ago, if its the same then i reckon they are all right.

tomanders91 · 12 Nov 2007 at 18:45

Everest is the same, also motherboard is much hotter than cpu, its 44c atm, is that normal?

cpu is at 24c, with core 1 and 20, core 2 at 22

longshanks · 12 Nov 2007 at 19:57

I could not get Coretemp to work with Vista64 even with the link i was given. Speedfan is not reliable. I could do with a good monitoring program. Guess i will have to wait for some to become reliable with Vista 64bit

tomanders91 · 12 Nov 2007 at 19:59

coretemp does work on vista64, you just need batch file thing, im sure someone will link it to you.

longshanks · 12 Nov 2007 at 20:08

I tried that and i had trouble with it!! Maybe i was doing something wrong?