Terror Plot Foiled

dirtydog said:
Zip is saying that those suspected of terrorism should simply be executed without trial.
Click to expand...

No im not so stop putting words into my mouth.

Read my posts propperly.

Those who are found to be terrorists should be exicuted with out trial.

Found as in Caught read handed sitting on huge amounts of plans and bombs and chemicals. You know stuff that gets used in attacks?

Clear evidence like that.
 
Rather the disruption than the possibilty of many people losing their lives, simple as that, fully appreciate that people in the airports won't be thinking that right about now, but it's essential.
 
Visage said:
It doesnt matter.

Obviously 'having cash' = you're a dirty terrorist scummer who should be killed, just to be on the safe side.
Click to expand...

With responses like that I should ask you the same question that I asked Borris earlier...

You decry the Daily Mail for sensationalism, or are you merely jealous that they also use your favourite technique?
 
Zip said:
Those who are found to be terrorists should be exicuted with out trial.
Click to expand...

"Those who are found to be terrorists" - so who is going to be the judge of that? The police? MI5? The government?

If there is such clear evidence then what is wrong with having a trial? Otherwise an innocent person might be wrongly executed?
 
All flights into or out of Gatwick suspended (BBC News 24)

Edit: Easyjet flights only
 
Last edited:
Isnt it funny how, when the government says 'The NHS is in a good state', this forum is full of people willing to say they're lying, based on their (insignificant in the wider scheme of things), personal experiences, but when the government says 'We're at risk of being attacked' its treated as Holy Writ, not to be doubted under any circumstances.

I never thought I'd see so many of the usual suspects shouting down people who doubt what the government says.
 
Zip said:
No im not so stop putting words into my mouth.

Read my posts propperly.

Those who are found to be terrorists should be exicuted with out trial.

Found as in Caught read handed sitting on huge amounts of plans and bombs and chemicals. You know stuff that gets used in attacks?

Clear evidence like that.
Click to expand...

So i'll ask you again - where is the harm in putting them on trial?
 
Zip said:
No No we cant do that.
We need to give them a trial and prove they are guilty before we can do that.
We dont want to make a mistake if they arnt guilty after all
Click to expand...

Sorry didnt explain properly im all for fair trial but if found guilty hope they rot in hell. :mad:
 
dirtydog said:
"Those who are found to be terrorists" - so who is going to be the judge of that? The police? MI5? The government?

If there is such clear evidence then what is wrong with having a trial? Otherwise an innocent person might be wrongly executed?
Click to expand...

Like i said. Its obvious that someone is a Terrorist if they get caught red handed.
Read the full post.
Whos the judge of it? Well who ever give the orders
 
dirtydog said:
So what you want is a police state basically. Give up our freedoms that our ancestors fought for, so that the government can 'protect us' - like 1930s Germany.
Click to expand...
Or 1960s Cambodia.

Or 1970s Spain.

Or 1990s Balkan states.

Or 1950s, 60s, 70s and 80s Romania, Bulgaria et. al.
 
Visage said:
Isnt it funny how, when the government says 'The NHS is in a good state', this forum is full of people willing to say they're lying, based on their (insignificant in the wider scheme of things), personal experiences, but when the government says 'We're at risk of being attacked' its treated as Holy Writ, not to be doubted under any circumstances.

I never thought I'd see so many of the usual suspects shouting down people who doubt what the government says.
Click to expand...
On days like this supporting the government/police/security services is a sensible option. If there are problems they will be reaveled tomorrow and on following days.
 
Visage said:
So i'll ask you again - where is the harm in putting them on trial?
Click to expand...

There is no harm
But i dont see the need to if you catch them in the process :)

If you had a kid and you saw him kicking the crap out of a kitten. Would you go up to him and give him some what of a trail to prove hes innocent even when you saw he was kicking the defenceless kitten or would you just tell him off and tell him to leave it alone with out second thought?
 
Zip said:
There is no harm
But i dont see the need to if you catch them in the process :)

If you had a kid and you saw him kicking the crap out of a kitten. Would you go up to him and give him some what of a trail to prove hes innocent even when you saw he was kicking the defenceless kitten or would you just tell him off and tell him to leave it alone with out second thought?
Click to expand...

But who decides what is and isnt clear cut?
 
Zip said:
There is no harm
But i dont see the need to if you catch them in the process :)
Click to expand...
The smiley doesn't negate the authoritarian nature of your suggestion. We have a seperation of law enforcement from the judicual system for a reason.
 
Zip said:
Like i said. Its obvious that someone is a Terrorist if they get caught red handed.
Read the full post.
Whos the judge of it? Well who ever give the orders
Click to expand...

And the overall benefit to the country of not giving a fair trial would be.....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom