TF2 Average FPS - Post here

SMB30 · 24 Feb 2009 at 22:54

Using a timedemo of about 5 minutes on ctf_turbine: 75.54fps

Res: 1920x1200, All settings max with the below spec in sig.

Would particularly like to see average fps from newer core i7 and newer phenoms.

uv · 24 Feb 2009 at 23:30

can you share the timedemo, then we're all using the same benchmark?

SMB30 · 24 Feb 2009 at 23:34

I thought about that and there is, unfortunately a major patch tonight which would invalidate the demo.

I can post one tomorrow evening (after the patch).

Margaret · 24 Feb 2009 at 23:39

TF2 only uses single core so I doubt you will see much of a difference processor wise. (unless clocked above 3ghz obviously)

SMB30 · 24 Feb 2009 at 23:41

Margaret said:
TF2 only uses single core so I doubt you will see much of a difference processor wise. (unless clocked above 3ghz obviously)

Well aware of that. Thats why I want to run this test. Call it curiosity

bledd · 25 Feb 2009 at 00:11

after the scout update, post a demo here, and tell us all what settings to use (graphically) -take a screenshot of the settings page.

different res's with different os versions would be interesting

SMB30 · 25 Feb 2009 at 00:13

Good idea. Will do.

smogsy · 25 Feb 2009 at 08:47

i7 940 @ 3.6GHZ
6GB RAM
280GTX SLI

TF2 Full Game CTF_Turbine (new nvidia drivers helped a little)

1920x1200 everything high 16QCCSAF 16QCSSAA

32 player server 100FPS average drops to 90fps in places reaches 200fps in places to

i have now capped it at 66 to be in sink with server much better registration.

SMB30 · 25 Feb 2009 at 19:26

Demo to use timedemo command to test with: Demo

Ok, results with new patch:

And my settings:

uv · 25 Feb 2009 at 19:31

SMB30 said:
Demo to use timedemo command to test with

Trilinear filtering? Is that a joke? If you've got the juice to chuck on 4x AA, then you can at least use 8xAF to stop it looking like mud, surely?

SMB30 · 25 Feb 2009 at 19:33

uvmain said:
Trilinear filtering? Is that a joke? If you've got the juice to chuck on 4x AA, then you can at least use 8xAF to stop it looking like mud, surely?

lol.

Not really that fussed tbh, after all, its only cpu power i'm really interested in.

SMB30 · 25 Feb 2009 at 19:50

Just tried it at 8xmsaa and 16x aniostropic. Same result.

GPU power is not the deciding factor here.

SMB30 · 27 Feb 2009 at 19:08

No takers then?