• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** The AMD RDNA 4 Rumour Mill ***

Brutal, man fsr3.1 is still so bad, hard to believe amd users have put up with this for so long, fsr4 is amazing and everyone should be getting a 9070xt just to use fsr4

I don't think you can go much wrong with either in quality mode. It's once you step out of quality mode I generally have issues.
 
I started digging into undervolting. Off the bat the tuning area of Adrenaline is quite a bit different. There is no longer an auto-undervolt button. Though you can do it manually. New buttons are favor efficiency and favor performance. You also cannot change the power limit.

I tried manual undervolt. -100mv was a no go. Crashed in synthetic benchmarks. -75mv and ran the AMD stress test and it failed. I can run -50mv and pass the AMD stress test. Stress test seems pretty good at doing what it's supposed to. -50mv however was slightly worse in performance in synthetic benchmarks. Not sure if I lost the silicon lottery for undervolting.

How about overclocking? Well I can +200 and pass the AMD stress test. That is 3.5ghz, but how far will it go? +250 and the chip maxes out at 3.580ghz. Insane number for a GPU! Synthetics are slightly faster.

Favor efficiency does what it says. Very slightly lower scores for less power. Favor performace the opposite.

Given the changes to the tuning are my gut feeling is this card is quite a bit different than the previous gen and that is why tuning is setup differently.

For now I'm going to leave it stock with the custom fan curve. It runs great like that.
 
I started digging into undervolting. Off the bat the tuning area of Adrenaline is quite a bit different. There is no longer an auto-undervolt button. Though you can do it manually. New buttons are favor efficiency and favor performance. You also cannot change the power limit.

I tried manual undervolt. -100mv was a no go. Crashed in synthetic benchmarks. -75mv and ran the AMD stress test and it failed. I can run -50mv and pass the AMD stress test. Stress test seems pretty good at doing what it's supposed to. -50mv however was slightly worse in performance in synthetic benchmarks. Not sure if I lost the silicon lottery for undervolting.

How about overclocking? Well I can +200 and pass the AMD stress test. That is 3.5ghz, but how far will it go? +250 and the chip maxes out at 3.580ghz. Insane number for a GPU! Synthetics are slightly faster.

Favor efficiency does what it says. Very slightly lower scores for less power. Favor performace the opposite.

Given the changes to the tuning are my gut feeling is this card is quite a bit different than the previous gen and that is why tuning is setup differently.

For now I'm going to leave it stock with the custom fan curve. It runs great like that.
Which model do you have?
Vrams/hot spot temps with OC?
Mine is fine on -150mV 3330-3420mhz
 
I started digging into undervolting. Off the bat the tuning area of Adrenaline is quite a bit different. There is no longer an auto-undervolt button. Though you can do it manually. New buttons are favor efficiency and favor performance. You also cannot change the power limit.

I tried manual undervolt. -100mv was a no go. Crashed in synthetic benchmarks. -75mv and ran the AMD stress test and it failed. I can run -50mv and pass the AMD stress test. Stress test seems pretty good at doing what it's supposed to. -50mv however was slightly worse in performance in synthetic benchmarks. Not sure if I lost the silicon lottery for undervolting.

How about overclocking? Well I can +200 and pass the AMD stress test. That is 3.5ghz, but how far will it go? +250 and the chip maxes out at 3.580ghz. Insane number for a GPU! Synthetics are slightly faster.

Favor efficiency does what it says. Very slightly lower scores for less power. Favor performace the opposite.

Given the changes to the tuning are my gut feeling is this card is quite a bit different than the previous gen and that is why tuning is setup differently.

For now I'm going to leave it stock with the custom fan curve. It runs great like that.

Hmm that muscle dude from overclockers could undervolt his card a bit. I guess it's silicon lottery?

 
Have you done any diagnosis? What CPU do you have? What is CPU load? check GPU load against CPU load etc?
7600
Plan is to check other games
22742121_1.jpg
22742019_1.jpg
 
Last edited:
So mine won't be here now until next week. Paid for sat delivery but looks like it didn't ship. Will cancel Saturday delivery on Monday. No bother my side still happy playing on my current card so will just wait for it to turn up.
 
Yes I did but in games like Metro Exodus very intense game it draw 364W so without undervolting maks clock was 2980-3000mhz, undervolt by -150mV core goes up to 3100mhz. Power draw still 364W.
In games like Wukong with the same settings max clock was 3420mhz, but power draw is all over the place.
 
Yes I did but in games like Metro Exodus very intense game it draw 364W so without undervolting maks clock was 2980-3000mhz, undervolt by -150mV core goes up to 3100mhz. Power draw still 364W.
In games like Wukong with the same settings max clock was 3420mhz, but power draw is all over the place.
Thanks for the feedback. Seems a hungry card! I may look further into this card...
 
Yes I did but in games like Metro Exodus very intense game it draw 364W so without undervolting maks clock was 2980-3000mhz, undervolt by -150mV core goes up to 3100mhz. Power draw still 364W.
In games like Wukong with the same settings max clock was 3420mhz, but power draw is all over the place.
The card has dual bios doesn't it? Have you tried it and if so can you report on the differences?
This is the card I was able to order and glad to see someone has one to show off :D
 
Back
Top Bottom