The Falklands thread

It's all to do with oil. When the war broke out in 1982, it was mentioned only once about the oil. Whoever get's the Island's, which includes South Georgia, will control the oil in the Antarctic. But there is a problem, there is a deal forbidding drilling in the Antarctic. Having said that, the people have the right to choose.:mad:

when the oil is needed and cheap, deals will be changed
 
interesting development - quite shocked at this:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/feb/22/argentinian-intellectuals-question-falklands?newsfeed=true


Argentinian intellectuals question country's claim to the Falklands

Group of 17 prominent figures comes in for criticism for supporting Falklands inhabitants' right to self-determination


---

group of 17 leading Argentinian intellectuals has come in for heavy criticism from the government of President Cristina Fernández de Kirchner and its members branded as traitors for supporting the right to self-determination of Falkland Islands inhabitants.

"I don't see how our country can impose on a group of 3,000 people, whose ancestors arrived there 180 years ago, a government, a sovereignty and a citizenship they do not want," said Fernando Iglesias, a former opposition legislator and one of the men behind Malvinas: An Alternative Viewpoint, a paper penned by the group. The paper argues against Argentina's long-standing position that Falklanders are a transplanted population from Britain with no rights over the islands....
 
Kudos to them for having the balls to speak out. Given what's gone on in the past in Argentina to people who've spoken out against the ruling regime, it must be difficult knowing the risk you take, especially with the fanaticism some of the ultranationalists treat the Falklands issue.
 
Good for them. I'm sure there are more like them in Argentina. I just hope no harm comes to them for speaking out.
 
Kudos to them for having the balls to speak out. Given what's gone on in the past in Argentina to people who've spoken out against the ruling regime, it must be difficult knowing the risk you take, especially with the fanaticism some of the ultranationalists treat the Falklands issue.

It certainly wouldn't have been advisable to speak out like that under the old regime that attacked the islands in the first place. I gather their current government isn't quite as evil as the old lot.
 
It certainly wouldn't have been advisable to speak out like that under the old regime that attacked the islands in the first place. I gather their current government isn't quite as evil as the old lot.

True, but the risk isn't so much from the government themselves so to speak, but the rabid party activists and supporters that Kirchner draws upon. At least for now.
 
It certainly wouldn't have been advisable to speak out like that under the old regime that attacked the islands in the first place. I gather their current government isn't quite as evil as the old lot.

Isn't quite as evil?! It's more than slightly different you know :p
 
Couple of decent articles from the Economist on the Argentine economy, had heard about the big mac price fixing before but fair to say they look borked

http://www.economist.com/node/21548229
http://www.economist.com/node/21548242

I chuckled at this picture of CFK as well

20120225_AMD001_0.jpg
 
Back
Top Bottom