The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread

LoadsaMoney · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:30

Its beating both the Ti and TX in that one

Silent_Scone · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:32

LoadsaMoney said:
Its beating both the Ti and TX in that one

Not with 4X MSAA @ 4K. What's the bandwidth doing?

Edit: Now that's interesting:

LoadsaMoney · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:37

I was looking at 2560/1600 - 2560/1440 with AA/AF, the TX was only ahead by 2 in Thief, everything else it was beat in, as was the Ti.

Orangey · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:37

If they really did give everyone the wrong driver then they just cost themselves how many millions?

Silent_Scone · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:38

Orangey said:
If they really did give everyone the wrong driver then they just cost themselves how many millions?

They can count their lucky stars there weren't millions on sale

. No, it will have made a sizeable impact. Just look how many 980Ti's have sold in the meantime.

Boomstick777 · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:39

Interesting read here:

Fury X kicking ass and taking names and high res.

AMD Radeon R9 Fury X took the lead in the top class of single-processor accelerator (400-800 dollars), confidently beating the recently released single processor flagship NVIDIA - GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Moreover, in a number of tests R9 Fury X is at a much more expensive product from the premium segment - GTX Titan X. A 2-3 Fury X test performance even reached the level of Radeon R9 295X2 (of course, we are not talking about a low-resolution, where speed can be limited by the graphics card environment).

https://translate.google.com/transl...u=http://www.ixbt.com/video3/fiji-part3.shtml

flopper · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:40

Silent_Scone said:
Not with 4X MSAA @ 4K. What's the bandwidth doing?

Edit: Now that's interesting:

Fury = My precious

a few driver revisions from amd for fury and we have a different setting

Silent_Scone · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:40

You're a bit late Boom

uksoldierboy · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:43

Gerard said:
No pump whine or anything?

None at all bud.

Boomstick777 · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:43

Silent_Scone said:
You're a bit late Boom

Ha I didn't realise

These reviews are all over the place?

Look at this bit:

three weeks ago, we were talking about the same thing to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti, but now it is clear that the former king from NVIDIA lost his throne

Click to expand...

uksoldierboy · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:45

Boomstick777 said:
No flicker here mate. Check your display-port cable and settings. 1.2 enabled?

Try a different cable?

Yeah bud 1.2 enabled, don't have another cable to try

chroniclard · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:45

Moar evidence required!

LoadsaMoney · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:47

Thats more like it! :cool:

uksoldierboy · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:51

Doing so googling and apparently is an Issue with AMD cards and a few 4k panels, although the AOC u2868PQU comes up an awful lot.

chroniclard · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:55

Ooo pay day, if only there was stock.....

Silent_Scone · 26 Jun 2015 at 14:56

Boomstick777 said:
Ha I didn't realise

These reviews are all over the place?

Look at this bit:

three weeks ago, we were talking about the same thing to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti

I wouldn't trust that, sounds a bit mental talking to a graphics card

chroniclard said:
Ooo pay day, if only there was stock.....

Ain't that the truth? 980TiG1, anyone?

AMD rules.

Scougar · 26 Jun 2015 at 15:00

Try a different power socket. I've noticed issues with flickering sometimes when on the same socket as the PC I'm using (It shouldn't... but hey ho).

LoadsaMoney · 26 Jun 2015 at 15:03

Im gona have to order that bloody monitor again now

stooeh · 26 Jun 2015 at 15:05

In the Mordor 4K Ultra results pic...
1xGTX TITAN X = 45fps, 2xGTX TITAN X = 109fps ?

Am I missing something here ?

Nutella33 · 26 Jun 2015 at 15:08

stooeh said:
In the Mordor 4K Ultra results pic...
1xGTX TITAN X = 45fps, 2xGTX TITAN X = 109fps ?

Am I missing something here ?

How averages work?