The General Theory of Relativity is Wrong

[Teki187]

Arghhh I actually read the first line before I checked the username, the title should have been the clue.

Ah yes, another "read the title, check the poster, join the crowd" person, ah the joy of the OCUK GD forum.

 

[Teki187]

The original paper was released 4 years ago and so far no one seems to have replicated the experiment.

Have they tried?

 

[mcast123]

Ah yes, another "read the title, check the poster, join the crowd" person, ah the joy of the OCUK GD forum.

more like..."checked the poster, knew his credibility was shot multiple times, years ago, joined the crowd"

 

[Cyanide]

Are they going to be using these new calculations to prove that it couldn't have been a plane that hit the pentagon?

 

[RDM]

Have they tried?

I would assume so, but have no idea. No supression seems to be going on though as here is the original paper in pdf format:

http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0603/0603033.pdf

 

[Teki187]

I would assume so, but have no idea. No supression seems to be going on though as here is the original paper in pdf format:

http://arxiv.org/ftp/gr-qc/papers/0603/0603033.pdf

Hmmm.

My suppression comment was more in regards to what could be happening in the LHC rather then the paper its self.

 

[Teki187]

more like..."checked the poster, knew his credibility was shot multiple times, years ago, joined the crowd"

I really couldn't care less about my street cred bro, but i'm pretty sure these scientists who created this experiment, deserve more respect then some jack the lad from the local street crowd trying to puff out his chest.

 

[RDM]

Hmmm.

My suppression comment was more in regards to what could be happening in the LHC rather then the paper its self.

What would they gain by suppressing a massive breakthrough in physics? Considering the LHC is all about massive breakthroughs in physics?

 

[growse]

Ninja post edit.

What is happening in the LHC that contradicts what they are saying?

Well, you're strongly suggesting that the LHC is hiding something. Either the LHC is hiding something that does exist, or that thing doesn't exist and there's a contradiction.

Its not one guy its a team of scientists.

One guy, one team, same difference. Until an experiment can be repeated by anyone around the world with the right equipment and expertise, it's not exactly verified. There's been many many instances in history of people announcing surprising results and then no-one being able to replicate them.

 

[Teki187]

What would they gain by suppressing a massive breakthrough in physics? Considering the LHC is all about massive breakthroughs in physics?

Well interests.

xyz put £100 million into it, they want "rights" to be the first to use said new tech for x years. Kind of thing.

IF they found say a unlimited renewable resource that would change the world, how would our government for example be able to tax said energy to the extent they do with petrol?

There is too much to loose in the above example.

 

[growse]

Well interests.

xyz put £100 million into it, they want "rights" to be the first to use said new tech for x years. Kind of thing.

IF they found say a unlimited renewable resource that would change the world, how would our government for example be able to tax said energy to the extent they do with petrol?

There is too much to loose in the above example.

You understand what they're trying to do at the LHC, don't you?

Hint: it's not looking for an 'unlimited renewable resource'. Whatever that is.

 

[Infam0us]

These threads make me wet

 

[Nanoman]

No. Just no.

 

[Teki187]

You understand what they're trying to do at the LHC, don't you?

Hint: it's not looking for an 'unlimited renewable resource'. Whatever that is.

You do realise that i said FOR EXAMPLE!

Hint: I was not implying they were looking for a URR.