The IWF, uploading and transparent proxies

Caporegime
Joined
17 Feb 2006
Posts
29,263
Location
Cornwall
So it seems both uploading.com and fileserve.com are on the IWF "suspicious sites" list, presumably for people uploading CP (the "why don't you have a seat" kind).

After a bit of research, it appears that all requests for files from those sites are routed through something called a "transparent proxy", meaning all UK users have the same IP address (or share a very small amount).

The net result of this is that no-one from the UK can currently freely download any file from uploading.com or fileserve.com (and I suspect a ton of others), due to usage limitations. *If you are a paying member I don't think this applies.

So on my travels I looked for ways to circumvent this transparent proxy, the workings of which don't entirely make sense to me. Anyway, the suggestions were "use the IP address instead of the URL". Well, any attempt to access fileserve.com using any of its IPs results in a blank page. No joy there.

Second suggestion was "use HTTPS" instead of normal HTTP. Again, no dice. Page not found/time-out.

Now I could ask the uploader to put it on a different site, but there's no guarantee rapidshare or whoever won't end up on the IWF suspicious list next month, screwing us over again.

So how, ladies and gents, do you bypass this stupid transparent proxy that's shafting all UK users?
 
Changing ISP is not an option for me atm, as I'm locked into a 24 month contract.

It will be your ISP that is implementing the proxy. In this case you will need another computer on another ISP to "bounce" off. This could be a friends computer or a server or just about anything else that isn't using your ISP.
 
A transparent proxy shouldnt do anything to your ip address, that may even be a reasonable definition of transparent. It could block any connection it fancied though.

One could however store a copy of everything you download with no particular hassle.

I cant get squid to behave with https, so that would probably stop them recording anything useful.

Tor is a good solution here, glad it worked for you.
 
The IWF seems to get the blame for this but I'm not convinced, I think it's just the hosts limiting the usage. There are much bigger hosts that never seem to have this problem and others seem to have intermittent problems.


I will check out Tor though.
 
The IWF seems to get the blame for this but I'm not convinced, I think it's just the hosts limiting the usage. There are much bigger hosts that never seem to have this problem and others seem to have intermittent problems.


I will check out Tor though.

Yer Tor is a very nice solution, just make sure you don't tunnel private info like logins/passwords through it for non HTTPS/SSL sites.
 
Get a decent ISP that doesn't do it, or anything of the sort for that matter.

Simply as its rather easy to bypass any of these sorts of systems anyway, tunnelling traffic from another country, VPN services etc.

http://aaisp.net.uk/kb-broadband-realinternet.html

While it is good advice it's not entirely their fault, big ISPs pretty much got threatened into adopting the IWF filtering solution by the last government who said they'd legislate to make it mandatory if they didn't do something.

Thankfully in some ways, the fact the big ISPs swallowed it and went along is the saving grace of the small ISPs who don't implement it. If virgin/BT/be* had kicked up a fuss then it'd likely be a legal requirement for all ISPs now...
 
Back
Top Bottom