That isn't mutually exclusive. I can either give my capital to the bank, or keep it/ invest it myself.If you have an interest only deal you don't build equity as fast as you need for reinvestment in the same area.
That isn't mutually exclusive. I can either give my capital to the bank, or keep it/ invest it myself.If you have an interest only deal you don't build equity as fast as you need for reinvestment in the same area.
With the rates today you'd probably be needing at least 25% down to get better rates - it's the difference between 3.9% and 6.9% which is huge over the 22yr period. But yes to what you said.It has been exceptionally simple maths for many years. I watched a colleague build a housing empire side of desk at work. He bought a house with 20% down on BTL; house prices rose, he then took out the equity of the previous property and put 20% down on another BTL - rinse repeat.
But unlike many investment instruments, it delivers a monthly "income", albeit small. It also lets you fiddle tax for your own benefit e.g. claiming mileage to drive to the property, stationary etc..I think like anything, an investment is an investment. You could go all in on stocks, gold, watches, bonds, or property. Or, you could have a mix of them all. While property and real estate (both commercial and resi) comes with higher costs because of upkeep and wear, it also comes with the balance of general appreciation and the big part of it being a tangible asset that people use as a store of value. That store of value just comes with a cost to keep at the same time.
A few people in this thread have said that rent shouldn't be so high/higher than someone could get a mortgage for.
I don't think that is the case unless I'm missing something.
Looking around my postcode:
a 3-bed semi built in the 1980's cost about £260,000.
The rent on that house is about £900 a month
if you put a £50,000 deposit down, a 4.5% 25-year mortgage would be £1,168 a month £268 more than renting!
a 3-bed new build is about £365,000
The rent on that house is about £1200 a month
if you put a £50,000 deposit down, a 4.5% 25-year mortgage would be £1,750 a month £550 more than renting!
Are people putting down £100,000+ deposits or getting mortgages with a 60-year term?
You never did say what you do for a living...I guess it is. Landlords must be working so hard.
But unlike many investment instruments, it delivers a monthly "income", albeit small. It also lets you fiddle tax for your own benefit e.g. claiming mileage to drive to the property, stationary etc..
REITs or dividend stocks offer you similar.But unlike many investment instruments, it delivers a monthly "income", albeit small. It also lets you fiddle tax for your own benefit e.g. claiming mileage to drive to the property, stationary etc..
You never did say what you do for a living...
No you don't, silly gooseI work in tech and got a 20 bedroom mansion.
No you don't, silly goose
just think of the money a good slum landlord like all of the landlords on here (alegedly) could do with a 20 bed property.
You never did say what you do for a living...
that is exactly what a friend of mine does.... rents out student houses, he does really well out of it because his houses are actually nice (unlike the utter flea pit i stayed in at uni - in truth i didnt care but my mum hated it) and has a 24/7 call out promise which for kids away from home for 1st time parents really like. Not spoke to him for a while, he was getting worried as the uni was building a purpose built block of flats for students which would likely compete with his business.Rent it to students at 1000 a month each
Pretty sure he's Ronald McDonald.
again tho not all are like that! (I would like to say not even most, but i dont really know......)Yeah ripping off students is a dream.
5 or 6 to a property
Low expectations of quality
Rinse the deposit for damages every year. Quoting the same damage on the Inventory that they said they'd fix last year.l, but saying you did it yourself.
A desperate captive market.
You can rob them too once a year.
(Happened to me, actually key entry and all our sound systems stolen. Mine was just a all in 1 boombox affair. Others lost separate systems worth 100s.)
Welcome to east Oxford. Crowley road.
Scum land lords rinsing teenagers for everything and giving nothing but damp back.
Useless letting agents creaming off the top and doing literally nothing to help you but empty your bank account.
Then there is the running costs. Rent needs to cover maintenance, reinventions, insurance, and a pot of money to cover problems like renter skipping town. e.c.t Most of the anti landlord posters in here conveniently forget about the running costs of being a landlord and conveniently ignore the people who want to rent over buying there own home for a list of valid reasons. Its those anti landlord posters that are wrong and in some cases I find the anti landlord posters the immoral ones brushing good landlords who are helping under the same group as the bad ones.
Like who? Seriously, who in their right mind wants to rent long-term in this country? Boomers with their decent pensions can barely afford to rent once retired currently, what the heck is a 30-something going to do in 30-40 years when they can no longer work? It's an absolute ticking time bomb. The state should concentrate on building old people's homes rather than anything else, millennials and gen z's will have to be shipped out into state-funded retirement camps en masse at this rate.Yeah this is kind of my point. Some people do actually want to rent and have no interest in buying a house.
I rent my main homeLike who? Seriously