Even 25K is too high a limit.
You dont need a 25k car on motobility, you need the absolute cheapest possible option availalbe.
A couple 2 houses down from me dont work, and they have a mentally handicapped daughter, lovely people, however, they dont need a top of the range Focus C-MAX to run her around in once a week to the shops (which is the only time she is ever in it).
Rest of the time its the sunshine bus.
There should be a limit on car type, value, number of doors and CO2 rating as it seems they can have anything under a certain value.
Just seems a waste of money.
No objection to people getting mobility, just an objection to it being anything other than the cheapest available option.
Your comments have just shown how utterly out of touch you are.
I'm sorry but you've actually managed to annoy qyuite a bit.
It does NOT cost the taxpayer a penny more for a motorbility car to be £50k than £10k.
If you get DLA mobility component at the higher rate (IIRC £39 a week), you can use that to get a Motorbility car.
The car is LEASED, with the DLA paying the lease cost. If you go for a more expensive car, you pay an ADDITIONAL up front, non refundable fee which covers the excess cost.
The only exception is if you need a more expensive car specifically because your disability requires it (IE you need a vehicle with adaptations, or a particular size). The extra cost in that case is usually by a specific, needs tested grant. (IIRC there is a very good argument that the higher end cars actually make the Motorbility scheme money, as they often sell for more than expected at the end of the lease).
Why should anyone have to settle for the cheapest option?
The range of disabilities is huge, as are the individual circumstances.
Someone who is disabled and *shock* has a Family may need a car that can suit their disability, but also allow them to go out with the family.
A truly shocking idea, but it makes sense to let them get one car that does that, than have a car that only takes the disabled person and maybe one other...(seriously, get a couple of different wheelchair types, basic hand propelled and try putting them in the boot of a small, cheap car with a lot of them you can't fit the wheelchair in the boot without losing the use of the boot for anything else, and in some cases the back seats as well).
It's also not uncommon for people with some disabilities to have quite serious problems getting into some vehicles, so it makes sense to have a range of vehicles available that they can choose from - Someone who has a bad hip may desperately need an extra few inches in height to get into a car without problems, whilst someone who is Taller might need more leg room to be able to comfortably drive without pain (and conversely someone who is short or has limblolss may need a seat that is higher).
If you ever break a leg or do your knee in, then try getting into a cheap, small car and see how well you manage (and for extra fun, try getting a wheelchair into the boot of some of them whilst your leg is immobalised.
Sorry for the rant, but I get well and truly sick and tired of the idiiots who are fortunate enough to never have had an injury or illness that makes them have to consider things like how practical a given car is for a disability, giving their opinion on how the disabled should be limited to a single, or very limited range of vehicles.
There are many, many different disabilities, and oddly enough the cheapest and easiest way to cater for them is to offer a wide range of often standard vehicles (much cheaper than customising a specific type of vehicle for every use).
I very nearly replied with a comment that would have seen me suspending myself.