Indeed, replacing a CU is a few hundred quid normally so tiny in the grand scheme of buying a house. Anything older than about 10 years will probably be flagged as "doesn't conform with current standards" however it doesn't mean anything really - just the surveyor covering their own backs at this point. If you're really worried pay a trusted sparky £50 to visit the property for 30 minutes with you and take a quick look around.
They might feel it is worth the asking price even with the issues, I don’t think those three you listed are particularly major. The bay window probably just needs some new wood and a lick of paint, the CU swap and possible rewrite is pretty standard for surveyors covering themselves on elective and the wall ties is the surveyors get out clause as he can’t see them. I’d have bought the house after using the survey results to try and beat them down a little on price.We've decided to withdraw our offer, there were too many issues and we don't really want a project. House has gone back on the market for the same amount which I find underhanded. If the next person doesn't have a survey, they'll be buying a house with major issues that will cost the new owners a pretty penny.
I'm confused. The house you're buying has a sitting tenant? Someone has screwed up royally because your mortgage and contract should both state "vacant possession"bit of a woe is me post really but it just goes to show that buying a house isn't always as easy or straight forward as we'd like it to be.
He said that the vendor has just revealed that he needs an additional 4 weeks post any exchange, to clear the house for that reason....I'm confused. The house you're buying has a sitting tenant? Someone has screwed up royally because your mortgage and contract should both state "vacant possession"If so, you can sue for breach of contract no?
.
I'm confused. The house you're buying has a sitting tenant? Someone has screwed up royally because your mortgage and contract should both state "vacant possession"If so, you can sue for breach of contract no?
And did the selling agent never mention there were tenants in situ?
When we were looking (aiming to beat the July stamp duty holiday) we pretty much walked straight back out of a couple of house viewings because there were sitting tenants that hadn't been given notice..
What's your point? I'm sure it was a condition of getting our mortgage that the house we bought had to be vacant possession. Sounds like the people buying that house didn't have that stipulation but should have been aware of the time lag. So it's partly their fault as well. If they haven't exchanged I guess there's no breach of contract, but again, it was in our contract that it would be vacant possession.He said that the vendor has just revealed that he needs an additional 4 weeks post any exchange, to clear the house for that reason....
Makes sense. Sounds like a hobbyist landlord that probably didn't want to give notice to his tenants until he sold -- which as above, is entirely the wrong way to go about doing things. I'm sure standard notice is currently 3 months anyway, not 4 weeks as he's probably hoping... I'd be mindful...the tenants are in a flat which the guy at the top of our chain will be moving into. the guy who owns the house that our sellers are moving into said he could move out quickly. there was been no discussion around tenants until it came up on friday that he needs 4 weeks notice from exchange to move! our sellers were unaware of this as are we. we have spoken to the estate agent and told him to tell the guy at the top of the chain that we will be seeking compensation for the additional stamp duty and storage fees.
wait... what?!!?I'm sure standard notice is currently 3 months anyway, not 4 weeks as he's probably hoping...
yes and it will be, I think you just misunderstood the posts. No exchange has taken place and he does plan to complete with vacant possession. I pointed this out for clarity for you as you didn’t seem to understand that’s allWhat's your point? I'm sure it was a condition of getting our mortgage that the house we bought had to be vacant possession. Sounds like the people buying that house didn't have that stipulation but should have been aware of the time lag. So it's partly their fault as well. If they haven't exchanged I guess there's no breach of contract, but again, it was in our contract that it would be vacant possession.
..
https://england.shelter.org.uk/housing_advice/eviction/eviction_notices_from_private_landlords (a quick Google, Shelter is normally best resource for renters). Might be 4 months but this is all assuming they don't get in etc. Tenants might have been given notice and found somewhere wanting immediate move-in anyway which is quite often the casewait... what?!!?
Then I am really confused. I will be speaking with the agents tomorrow and my solicitor to find out what the deal is here.
I kinda missed the bit about not exchanged yet. But it still seems a bit screwy!yes and it will be, I think you just misunderstood the posts. No exchange has taken place and he does plan to complete with vacant possession. I pointed this out for clarity for you as you didn’t seem to understand that’s all![]()
They might feel it is worth the asking price even with the issues, I don’t think those three you listed are particularly major. The bay window probably just needs some new wood and a lick of paint, the CU swap and possible rewrite is pretty standard for surveyors covering themselves on elective and the wall ties is the surveyors get out clause as he can’t see them. I’d have bought the house after using the survey results to try and beat them down a little on price.
I still don’t think those three things necessarily warrant a Reduction in price, I would have asked (note I said try in my original post) but a refusal to negotiate wouldn’t necessarily have stopped me if I really wanted the house. Bank valuations are notoriously rubbish particularly so in the current fast moving market. There is a very good chance they will get someone to buy the house at the price they want if it is a a half decent property in a desirable area.The seller want willing to negotiate on price when the property had been undervalued by the banks so it was highly unlikely she would based on the survey
I still don’t think those three things necessarily warrant a Reduction in price, I would have asked (note I said try in my original post) but a refusal to negotiate wouldn’t necessarily have stopped me if I really wanted the house. Bank valuations are notoriously rubbish particularly so in the current fast moving market. There is a very good chance they will get someone to buy the house at the price they want if it is a a half decent property in a desirable area.
There isn't a list of critical issues there are three things two of which are only potential issues that come up on virtually every survey (Electrics and Wall Ties) because the surveyor lacks the expertise or access to do anything more than flag them as potential issues. If someone asked me for money off because the surveyor said the electrics might be dodgy I would expect the buyer to get an actual electrician to confirm this and the same with the wall ties asking a vendor for money of because something may be an issue isn't ever going to fly.A mortgage undervalue AND a list of critical issues from the surveyor would definitely give me pause for thought too though if the seller is unwilling to change their price.