Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
For 'Out of the box' comparisons we have a stock clock results table here http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/sho...41&postcount=2
This is to compare the performance between different brands of GPU without any user overclocking, for this please add the make, model, standard clock speeds and the tag *GPU Comparison* to your results page.
So my 7950 is a factory overclocked version @ 950c/1250m and i usually underclock to a stock setting @ 800c/1250m when doing a stock run. Does anybody know the original stock clocks for a 7950? I see 880 core for some but need some verification.
Thanks
Sorry Humbug i can't remember what clocks i used now. It was either 975/1250 or 1050/1250. I will run it again at some point. Its a pain in the ass for me as i have to change my magnifier settings every time i want to run this restart and change it again so can't see myself running this more than a couple of times.
I'm confused, you say 'stock clocks' and then show a factory overclock of 93Mhz on the core?
I would argue they are 'default' clock for his card. As his card has a factory OC I don't think they are 'stock' clocks.
I don't see the point in the chart using default clocks as this will just vary based on what card you've got and are no more useful than comparing OC clocks. If it used 'stock' clocks, i.e. 947/1250 for a 290, 1000/1250 for a 290X then you could see how the cards compare at the same clocks to see if there's anything else that might make a difference (i.e. VRAM make).
Using 'default' clocks just seems like it punishes peopel that bought earlier non-OC'd cards.
Another thing that could be interesting if finding clocks that a lot of cards can do and clock them all to that. For example say 800/1250 and then have everyone clock to that whether they have a 290, 290X, 7970, 280X, 780Ti...
Just tried again with full screen and I scored a lot less than a single HD 7950.
That's a nice clocking 7970 you have there Mr Wazzy chops. Why don't you bring it to the coolest new benchmark on ocuk, the LuxMark bench thread and see if you can embarrass Humbug and his 290.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18596711
Bobie8 's extreme run score is wrong in opening post btw, I was horrified when I saw it, was about to redownload benchmark see what was wrong until I realised