** The Official Space Flight Thread - The Space Station and Beyond **

That launch pad looks eerily flimsy with an odd flame deflector configuration; looks like it will expel in all directions including back on to the platform itself.
 
Its about time we had a rocket bigger than the saturn series :)

Impressive stuff, but a shame it looks crap and has zero style about it.
 
Its about time we had a rocket bigger than the saturn series :)

Impressive stuff, but a shame it looks **** and has zero style about it.

In space nobody really cares. I suppose with a potential 100 person capacity it will look a bit like a bus. ;)
 
Now targeting 14:20BST; both lower and upper stages are prop loading...

Why are both the booster and starship both not being recovered. Why would you not at least try?
I would imagine logistics and effort needed attempting to recover both stages...

Where did you hear that, they are not recovering? I've been hearing tidbits here and there.
Nope, both stages are safely crashing with Starship ending up near Hawaii where they might fire holes into it to sink it if it doesn't break up by itself.
 
Last edited:
Why are both the booster and starship both not being recovered. Why would you not at least try?
This was always planned to be the case for the initial launch. there was a little bit of discussion at one point of them attempting recovery of the booster but nothing more than talk. Upper stage was always planned to ditch.
This is a proof of concept that it can even launch correctly. Gotta walk before they can run.
 
The amount of people watching between the different streams is insane! I hope it dosnt scrub. I'm feeling optimistic however you just never know with these launches. SOOO many new/experimental parts, all it takes is for one single failure to call a scrub.
 
Why are both the booster and starship both not being recovered. Why would you not at least try?
As @steve45 has just said, for the initial launch it isn't going to be recovered, by not trying it reduces complexity (less equipment to go wrong), as well as reducing weight and cost slightly.

Future versions will be though, in the same way that the Falcon craft evolved over time to be
 
Why are both the booster and starship both not being recovered. Why would you not at least try?

Not worth the risk. With the booster they will land it vertically in the sea, if it works perfectly I'm sure the next flight they will attempt to catch it. Starship has to come through re-entry and if it survives that it then has to belly flop into the sea. The launch tower infrastructure apparently costs more in materials, labour and time and isn't worth risking.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom