Moved my post from the Curiosity inspired project thread
One of the first high res colour pics:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00003/mcam/0003ML0000125000E1_DXXX.jpg
The colour is so rusty, imaging having a base there with artificial lighting for 6500k, then walking outside, you'd feel weird!
Seconds after the NASA robot's landing Sunday night, Curiosity managed to squeeze off a handful of fuzzy, black-and-white photographs. One, taken with a device on its rear known as a Hazcam, captured the pebble-strewn ground beneath the rover and one of its wheels - and a blotch, faint but distinctive, on the horizon. The images were relayed by a passing satellite. Two hours later, the satellite passed overhead again.
This time, Curiosity sent home a new batch of higher-resolution photos. They showed the same horizon. The blotch was gone. Space junkies raced onto the Internet with giddy speculation about the difference between the photos.
Curiosity, the largest spacecraft ever sent to another planet, had just sailed through deep space for almost nine months and more than 350 million miles. It landed on its own, meaning scientists had no control over where, exactly, it would wind up, what direction it would be pointed in nor when it would snap its first images.
After all of those variables, the space junkies insisted, Curiosity had somehow snapped a photo of its chariot crash-landing a safe distance away, as planned. The camera shutter had been open for 200 milliseconds. The blotch did look like a billowing plume of some sort, erupting from the horizon
Nice. This image demostrates well the focusing capabilities of the cameras that they've been talking about compared to the earlier rovers.One of the first high res colour pics:
http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/msl-raw-images/msss/00003/mcam/0003ML0000125000E1_DXXX.jpg
The colour is so rusty, imaging having a base there with artificial lighting for 6500k, then walking outside, you'd feel weird!