The ONE AND ONLY ***OFFICIAL*** Crysis thread - SPOILERS!

Gerard said:
Who really cares at all? He's just running around spouting crap about running res and settings that are impossible with current hardware. Most people are trying to tell him he's wrong to clue him in more but he doesn't want to know as he obviously thinks he must have some type of one in the world super pc.

"lol"

:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

Perhaps ignorance is bliss when crysis in concerned:rolleyes:
 
perox said:
I've just loaded Crysis up on XP all high with 16xaa and i'm getting 20-25fps on the first level. It is a lot higher than I was expecting, But still I wouldn't call this playable.

My rig is pretty much identical to romperstomper's as well, apart from my ram is @ 800Mhz and the my CPU is @ 3.5.
Click to expand...

thank you that proves that all you lot saying its not possible on current hardware are Wrong :p
 
romperstomper said:
your want to get yourself a decent computer mate :D
Click to expand...

If you can prove to me you are running 16xAA smoothly I would honestly swear on my life hand over £50 to you not that is a lot to you, but I would, thats how confident I am that you are not running with 16xAA, so stop calling people loosers and trying to say there computers are crap when you KNOW you are talking 100% complete BS.

If you look at my specs, it is specs of which give similar performance to you in crysis....

perox said:
I've just loaded Crysis up on XP all high with 16xaa and i'm getting 20-25fps on the first level. It is a lot higher than I was expecting, But still I wouldn't call this playable.

My rig is pretty much identical to romperstomper's as well, apart from my ram is @ 800Mhz and the my CPU is @ 3.5.
Click to expand...

Dont you check for jaggys? Turn 16xAA off and tell me what performance you are getting, if you are right and AA is @ 16X then with AA off you should be getting 40+ all the time at 1680x1050.


Anyone who thinks they are running at 16xAA, check your settings, you are NOT running at 16xAA, I repeat, you are NOT running at 16xAA.
 
Last edited:
With 8xAA I got around 16fps, this then shot down and 16xAA resulted in 1.6fps, to GTX wont be getting anything over 20fps for a fact, infact I dont think it was 16xAA I think it was still 8xAA...

Untitled-8.jpg


Crysis @ 4xAA, 1680x1050, All High = 22fps average in XP, the GTX wont get much more than this, 5-10fps tops, infact I'm probs overdoing it there, could be 5fps tops.
 
Last edited:
willhub said:
With 8xAA I got around 16fps, this then shot down and 16xAA resulted in 1.6fps, to GTX wont be getting anything over 20fps for a fact, infact I dont think it was 16xAA I think it was still 8xAA...

Untitled-8.jpg


Crysis @ 4xAA, 1680x1050, All High = 22fps average in XP, the GTX wont get much more than this, 5-10fps tops, infact I'm probs overdoing it there, could be 5fps tops.
Click to expand...

thats because your running the game in Vista with an inferio computer ,single core ,half the memory what do you expect ! Its a known fact that DX10 eats performance !
 
romperstomper said:
thats because your running the game in Vista with an inferio computer ,single core ,half the memory what do you expect ! Its a known fact that DX10 eats performance !
Click to expand...

Well for your information!

Its not a single core, its a dual core, also cpu usage on it does not get to 100% and upgrading to a quad would make no difference to performance at this time.
I'm not running it in DX10, I am running it in DX9, and all I need to do to bring my PC up to the performance of yours in most games is get an 8800GTX, but even with an 8800GTX I would not be running with 16xAA because its not possible.

And I'm actually running 4GB of ram, 2x GeIL with added Ballistix in there and before you try and say anything about that, no 2 different brands are not causing performance drops, my system performs as expected and I'm telling you that your are not running with 16xAA, your fps will almost certainly be down into the teens. Performance with 2GB is not much different to 4GB in crysis since its not using all the memory...

Honestly how many times is it going to take for someone to tell you before it sinks into your head that you're not running at 16xaa as its not possible, it sounds likely you are mistaking AA for AF and I can run 16xAF in Crysis yes but 4xAA is not good and as I said I've just tried it in XP with 4xAA which gives me an average of 22fps.
 
Last edited:
willhub said:
Well for your information!

Its not a single core, its a dual core, also cpu usage on it does not get to 100% and upgrading to a quad would make no difference to performance at this time.
I'm not running it in DX10, I am running it in DX9, and all I need to do to bring my PC up to the performance of yours in most games is get an 8800GTX, but even with an 8800GTX I would not be running with 16xAA because its not possible.

And I'm actually running 4GB of ram, 2x GeIL with added Ballistix in there and ebfore you try and say anything about that, no 2 different brands are not causing performance drops, my system performs as expected and I'm telling you that your are not running with 16xAA, your fps will almost certainly be down into the teens.
Click to expand...



u need the quad core cpu too. and change your sig if u got the 4 gigery now.
 
romperstomper said:
thats because your running the game in Vista with an inferio computer ,single core ,half the memory what do you expect ! Its a known fact that DX10 eats performance !
Click to expand...

you talk ****.

sli 8800GT's, Q6600 @ 2.9ghz, 3gb ram. i cant get decent rates with 4xaa @ 1680x1050. modded config AND xp pro. and my pc whoops your 'inferio' pc into the ground. dont talk so much smack on a forum without backing your **** up.

download fraps and record us a video of you playing at 25+ fps at 16xaa.
 
Am I going to have to go out and buy an 8800Ultra and a Q6600 and overclock it to like 4 Ghz to show that you cant use 16xAA? I know no one cares but I care that someone thinks they can run 16xAA when they cant, little thing like this really annoy me.
 
ergonomics said:
you talk ****.

sli 8800GT's, Q6600 @ 2.9ghz, 3gb ram. i cant get decent rates with 4xaa @ 1680x1050. modded config AND xp pro. and my pc whoops your 'inferio' pc into the ground. dont talk so much smack on a forum without backing your **** up.

download fraps and record us a video of you playing at 25+ fps at 16xaa.
Click to expand...

again i only see 3 gig of ram and that means you don;t own his inferior rig.
and also 2 x 8800gt will still only show up as 512mb vram, the gtx has 768 so it owns that too.

you need to out class it in every way then you can claim you have the power!!!!!!!!!!!
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom