The ongoing Elon Twitter saga: "insert demographic" melts down

Status
Not open for further replies.
Twitter is a public forum...
Twitter isn't a forum platform and it never has been.

...it's not like having Facebook friends where you choose who can read your posts...
Unless they've change it, public profiles on Facebook are/were just that; you typically had/have to lock it down to friends to do what you've mentioned.
And Twitter is closer to Facebook in terms of a social media platform that it is a forum platform.

I think the block function should allow you to no longer see someone elses posts...
That would just result in the spamming of retweets and comments from the person/people you've blocked and ultimately, it removes a feature that allows users, from all backgrounds/views, to manage Twitter to their liking.
No one wants Twitter to become a constant, 'who can shout the loudest' competition, as that will just turn it into one giant echo chamber of a single type of user.
 
So the other side is that I just block everyone who disagrees with what I say and has evidence of why I'm wrong, then I'm free to post whatever I want without being worried about being corrected.

There is community notes to correct any misinformation, that is exactly what that was created for. If it is just opinion then so what? you know what they say about opinions. This will just be a massive boom for trolls, they can now troll away to their hearts content and ruin threads of people who's opinions/messaging they don't like. Its a terrible idea that will just make it even more toxic.
 
Pretty sure an ignore function would tick that box lol
And you think Apple's lawyers don't know the difference between a mute/ignore and a full on block?

IIRC Google have pretty much the same wording.

As several authors have pointed out a block by them on their accounts means their actual followers/fans etc don't have to wade through huge piles of excrement to see actual normal responses.
I've seen several games/authors etc pointing out if this goes through it's the nail in the coffin for their use of Twitter because they and their fans/folliower/readers have had so much junk from the likes of gamers gate and comics gate idiots that block lists are the only way to actually use twitter to interact with normal, at least semi functional humans.
 
Last edited:
And you think Apple's lawyers don't know the difference between a mute/ignore and a full on block?

IIRC Google have pretty much the same wording.

As several authors have pointed out a block by them on their accounts means their actual followers/fans etc don't have to wade through huge piles of excrement to see actual normal responses.
I've seen several games/authors etc pointing out if this goes through it's the nail in the coffin for their use of Twitter because they and their fans/folliower/readers have had so much junk from the likes of gamers gate and comics gate idiots that block lists are the only way to actually use twitter to interact with normal, at least semi functional humans.

Last time Elon had an issue with Apple he just sorted it out with Tim Cook directly. I doubt Apples lawyers would be involved. The purpose of Apples user agreement is obviously to stop users being harassed, understandably, an ignore function for the user would be perfectly sufficient in ticking that box. People will leave Twitter for whatever reason they choose, I'm not sure Elon is going to be particularly fussed. They'll end up sat on some dead platform with all the other stubborn Musk haters while probably having a secret Twitter account
 
Last edited:
Twitter is by default an open platform.

The only way to attempt to stop someone stalking an account is either to block that person and set your account to protected.

The problem with block alone is someone can just view the account by not signing in to Twitter.

Relying on the mute means the stalker doesn't have to leave the site, and doesn't know they have been muted.
 
Last time Elon had an issue with Apple he just sorted it out with Tim Cook directly. I doubt Apples lawyers would be involved. The purpose of Apples user agreement is obviously to stop users being harassed, understandably, an ignore function for the user would be perfectly sufficient in ticking that box. People will leave Twitter for whatever reason they choose, I'm not sure Elon is going to be particularly fussed. They'll end up sat on some dead platform with all the other stubborn Musk haters while probably having a secret Twitter account

How did he sort it with Apple? Isnt it more to join via the Apple store still? If so thats not sorted.
 
Last time Elon had an issue with Apple
You've worded that in a funny incorrect way to make Elon look like the good guy.

What you should have said was "the last time Elon made apple have an issue with him, Elon went direct and got schooled and did everything apple originally told him to do and elon back tracked, giving up no concessions and came away looking weak and stupid that he couldn't just read what apple initially told him, and he had to waste their time and go direct to Tim cook, who no doubt, is way more important than helping elon deal with Elon's own self brought on issues"
 
Last edited:
The EU new data rules are much higher up Elon's worries than Apple - the twitter idiot pete/gate ... obviously not aware of them -
elons app has to have formal mechanism for abuse review with 3rd party review, and blocking yadayada otherwise he's fined .. or out of Europe.

e: elon's new 99% organiuc/ai claims for tesla fsd https://www.teslarati.com/elon-musk-shares-tesla-fsd-beta-v11-4-7-v12-update/
should help reduce twitter membership

e2: DSA obligations
In EU, anyway, digital service act, making progress 20 Jan & should neuter him/spotify 20Jan
- when will Clegg pop up, to defend meta.

MEPs give green light to open negotiations with member states
...
Removing illegal content and preventing the spread of disinformation
The Digital Services Act (DSA) proposal defines clear responsibilities and accountability for providers of intermediary services, and in particular online platforms, such as social media and marketplaces.

The DSA establishes a “notice and action” mechanism, as well as safeguards, for the removal of illegal products, services or content online. Providers of hosting services should act on receipt of such a notice “without undue delay, taking into account the type of illegal content that is being notified and the urgency of taking action”. MEPs also included stronger safeguards to ensure notices are processed in a non-arbitrary and non-discriminatory manner and with respect for fundamental rights, including the freedom of expression

...
Additional obligations for very large platforms
Very large online platforms (VLOPs) will be subject to specific obligations due to the particular risks they pose regarding the dissemination of both illegal and harmful content. The DSA would help to tackle harmful content (which might not be illegal) and the spread of disinformation by including provisions on mandatory risk assessments, risk mitigation measures, independent audits and the transparency of so-called “recommender systems” (algorithms that determine what users see).
 
Last edited:
GH9PTsj.png

It never gets old watching Elon get fact checked
 
GH9PTsj.png

It never gets old watching Elon get fact checked

Yeah but...

Last time Elon had an issue with Apple he just sorted it out with Tim Cook directly. I doubt Apples lawyers would be involved. The purpose of Apples user agreement is obviously to stop users being harassed, understandably, an ignore function for the user would be perfectly sufficient in ticking that box. People will leave Twitter for whatever reason they choose, I'm not sure Elon is going to be particularly fussed. They'll end up sat on some dead platform with all the other stubborn Musk haters while probably having a secret Twitter account

Im still waiting to see what he actually sorted though.
 
Last edited:
The EU new data rules are much higher up Elon's worries than Apple - the twitter idiot pete/gate ... obviously not aware of them -
elons app has to have formal mechanism for abuse review with 3rd party review, and blocking yadayada otherwise he's fined .. or out of Europe.

e: elon's new 99% organiuc/ai claims for tesla fsd https://www.teslarati.com/elon-musk-shares-tesla-fsd-beta-v11-4-7-v12-update/
should help reduce twitter membership

e2: DSA obligations

Elon doesn't worry about the EU, he'll snap his fingers and they'll do as he commands. Just like Tim Cook did..... oh.
 
Im still waiting to see what he actually sorted though.


Companies don't exist in a bubble, if Apple had an issue with something a company like Twitter was doing they'd discuss it with them, Apple has millions of iPhone users who use Twitter and they won't be keen to take it off their store over a minor issue
 

Companies don't exist in a bubble, if Apple had an issue with something a company like Twitter was doing they'd discuss it with them, Apple has millions of iPhone users who use Twitter and they won't be keen to take it off their store over a minor issue

Ah yes I remember the story now.
 

Companies don't exist in a bubble, if Apple had an issue with something a company like Twitter was doing they'd discuss it with them, Apple has millions of iPhone users who use Twitter and they won't be keen to take it off their store over a minor issue

Update: Musk says that he and Cook resolved a misunderstanding about Twitter potentially being removed from the ‌App Store‌, which Cook said Apple had not considered.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom