Associate
people dont understand the difference when actual gaming has no to little difference in gameplay
but you pay 3x as much for a nvidia card that dont do any difference
utube reviewers dont understand that
I'll echo what a few of us have stated recently, but we are in dire need of old-school reviewers who actually take time to test, describe and compare (and quantify where possible) the actual experience between cards. With new features like DLSS/FSR, frame gen etc. we need this more than ever because virtually no one is showing the actual detractions of using these (which is super apparent when seen first hand, IMO). Historically, this methodology has brought to light (and often ended or forced amelioration) of technologies like SLI/Crossfire, Physx, and varous AA/upscaling tech that had negative impact on IQ and frame stability.
It's not that (most) Youtube viewers don't understand: it's that they are intent on showing only basic FPS metrics because a) this is easier, b) they would get blowback from manuafactuers (and an entire industry) who have a stake in using these new features to generate sales.