Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Competition is good, hopefully this will give AMD the kick up the behind it needs!! With the recent cutbacks and driver delays, I just get the impression that the driver 'team' consists of 3 blokes and a dog under a stair cupboard!!
The dog is for when they get bored and then they get the peanut butter out![]()
to bad AMD still is the best brand with the best gpu and still king of the hill.
This is all smoke and mirrors and tbh doesnt tell the full true story, as usual Nividia are glossing over the actual facts by crowing about their current top end card basically having the highest fps of the cards tested.
When in actual reality if you check the Percentage Increase that DX gave to the 290, you will see the actual increase was higher on the AMD card
Dont believe me? check Anandtechs review
www.anandtech.com/show/8962/the-directx-12-performance-preview-amd-nvidia-star-swarm/3
Check the figures, AMD cards all gain a higher Percentage increase in performance compared to the Nvidia cards, while Nvidia cards might currently hit higher fps marks, the actual performance increase is higher on AMD GPU's
Now if the new AMD gpus blow away the Nvidia stuff, and the percentage increases are consistant, well.........
Well, I lol'dSo you'd say 3.5 guys?
A puff piece from Nvidia.com no less...
and of course the usual begging off "oh, I just thought people would find it interesting" "oh, I just copy and pasted" "oh, I just happened to be reading it"
PR bah bah bah bah.. How anyone at this moment trust anything nvidia says is beyond me. 3.5 worth of bull..
Sure this blog isn't going to big up nvidia is it O Wait.
Is that like when TV's were 'HD Ready' but not actually Full HD?
If I'm honest, I actually care less about Nvidia vs AMD on dx12 far less than how well that dx12 will widely and properly being used in games. Going by dx10/dx11, it was hardly impressive in terms of games that actually use them, nevermind using them well.
That's why in a way I kinda feel sorry for those who already had 780/780ti/290/290x switching to the 970/980 because of the efficiency hype.Yep, I rather wait for proper dx12 graphic cards built from scratch.
That's why in a way I kinda feel sorry for those who already had 780/780ti/290/290x switching to the 970/980 because of the efficiency hype.
For people already have those cards, they smart money would be wait for those properly new gen high-end cards and upgrade to them from the 780/780ti/290/290x. Nvidia is laughing all the way to the bank selling what in essence are new gen 60/60Ti for 70/80 money (and 50Ti for 60 money)![]()
If I'm honest, I actually care less about Nvidia vs AMD on dx12 far less than how well that dx12 will widely and properly being used in games. Going by dx10/dx11, it was hardly impressive in terms of games that actually use them, nevermind using them well.
...
+1. Spot on. All depends on how quickly and efficiently it gets adopted by those developing console games. We all know we'll only get crappy console ports anyway so who cares whether it's in dx11 or dx12, initially anyway. By the time we get Windows 10 and games developers consistently using it we'll have much better optimized dx12 cards. I for one will hold onto my 780 for a littl while longer.
A puff piece from Nvidia.com no less...
and of course the usual begging off "oh, I just thought people would find it interesting" "oh, I just copy and pasted" "oh, I just happened to be reading it"
PR bah bah bah bah.. How anyone at this moment trust anything nvidia says is beyond me. 3.5 worth of bull..
Sure this blog isn't going to big up nvidia is it O Wait.