Previously I hated QuickTime 7. It was ugly, it was slow, and generally unusable.
It was ugly, but it was very usable. For starters it had features no media player on any platform had for years (actually there is still no full equivalent) - frame by frame progression back and forward with cursor keys, "play all frames" option which allowed you to bypass things like soft pulldown applied to media container and check the actual footage, every single frame of it. It also had those tiny touches - like the audio graphs next to progress bar, so you could immediately see if the audio was equal level in both channels and not over compressed. The control user had over playback and preview of "soft" container options was just fantastic:
Perhaps all those things were completely unimportant for someone who watches occasional rip on their laptop, but for anyone who use Mac as an editing machine the lack of old features in QTX is just shocking - it's literally Photoshop to MSPaint. We don't get to use the new, accelerated, HD optimized QTX, because after years of paying for Pro upgrades Apple just turned around and showed us their bare naked hairy one. The best they can offer us - people spending heavy thousands on editing machines is 5 years old "ugly and slow" piece of software to quote yourself...
It's fast, snappy, with a really nice UI and control interfact, and when you move the mouse away it gets rid of everything, including the border.
Again, that's nice when you play your iphone movie, but how do you for example perform QC on a footage that you can't see properly, since the massive controls obstruct large portion of the screen and come back up every time you scroll frame by frame though it with keys. All they had to do was a small tick in a menu that moves the controls below video window. And no one would even mention it. I know you guys might not see those things as necessity, but a lot of companies spent literally thousands of pounds for stuff like camera specific, MXF or Sheer components for QT, and now they get interface which is pretty, but about as useful as getting haircut done in motorbike helmet and balaclava.
And one doesn't discount the other - you can have a nice player that's usable for power users, all they had to do was think about both markets.
When Apple made it that you had to pay for a "Pro" upgrade I thought it was stupid, especially when some of the "Pro" features included Full-Screen, something that every other media player has as standard.
Believe me - it didn't make them any friends "in industry" either - but there are simply no alternatives. On windows or mac. Some things QT7 Pro does with ease are just miles ahead of everything else out there.