Poll: *** The Snow Leopard Thread - All Related Posts In Here ***

Are you going to upgrade to Snow Leopard?

  • Yes indeedy, that I am.

    Votes: 236 85.2%
  • No sir, not a chance.

    Votes: 41 14.8%

  • Total voters
    277
Waho! It just arrived on Sat morning and it's just finishing off installation on my MBP. Taken about 1hr so far with a reboot in between.
 
I've been playing around with Snow Leopard. Of those whose copies haven't arrived, you're not missing much.

Yeah, it's not spectacular. Lets put it this way - it's not as good as having Natalie Portman sat on your face, but it's also a whole lot better than a naked Jimmy Saville.
 
Has anyone here found that it worth it. I yet to see a improvement yet. But I did not do a Fresh install. I am thinking of Erase and install later to see if that shows a big different.
 
Has anyone here found that it worth it. I yet to see a improvement yet. But I did not do a Fresh install. I am thinking of Erase and install later to see if that shows a big different.

I recovered the better part of 10gb on my disk and I like the little ui tweaks. In terms of speed, it seems a tiny bit quicker and I think more improvements will be forthcoming. A lot of the improvements are there to enable progress, so once devs start using opencl and grand central's multicore functions it should show its worth.
 
Took 35 minutes to install as an upgrade.

Err holy cows it's quick on an SSD. The speed at which applications are opening/closing and generally functioning is a lot quicker.

In 32 bit mode all the apps I've got seem ok with the upgrade. Once Xcode 3.2 is installed I'll try the 6+4 fingered salute!
 
Last edited:
No Snow Leopard in my mailbox (Saturday mail just came in), and it was shipped on Aug 27... (raises fists to heavens and screams) DAMN YOU G3 WORLDWIDE NETHERLANDS BV!!
 
Err holy cows it's quick on an SSD.

I've noticed that, even snappier than before.


Only true irritation i've noticed so far is that if you open a folder before you set the default icon size to something you like it doesn't change to the default, which wouldn't be so much of a problem if the default wasn't super chunky.

edit: also you can no longer manually select printer drivers on the install, its either detected, detected + common or all.
 
Last edited:
on my late 2008 macbook its definitely speeded things up mail and safari are quicker and safari you get less beach ball on java heavy pages. Not sure it was worth £25 but hey its faster so im happy, if i go into system monitor you can see what apps are running in 64bit by the intel(64bit) in the kind, most but not all are 64 bit
 
Upgraded previous installation on 2008 imac 24" yesterday and everything went without a hitch. The ui improvements are cool, particularly expose now is much easier to find what you're looking for. Stacks are also much more useful and better at opening large numbers of items. Native apps do indeed much feel snappier. Safari seems much faster, for example the top sites feature is instant when opening a new tab and page rendering seems very rapid. Finder is quicker to launch and opening large directories of images for example is noticeable.

Is it worth it? I'd say for enthusiasts and power users, why not? I speculate if it had been possible to upgrade leopard by software update that Apple wouldn't have made it a free upgrade. Certainly the price of €30/£25 seems unlikely to generate huge revenue but seems a round figure that covers packaging, transportation, point of sale, what little promotion there has been, etc.
 
Yeah, it's not spectacular. Lets put it this way - it's not as good as having Natalie Portman sat on your face, but it's also a whole lot better than a naked Jimmy Saville.


lmao interesting way of putting it :D mmmm Natalie, guess what just got delivered


has there been any word about improvements on the ati 4850 in the new imacs ???? would be nice to see more fps
 
I reckon with all the changes under the hood that 10.7 (or even OS X 11.0 as it may turn out to be!) is going to be an equivalent change as OS 9 to OS X was.

Apple have something planned. Mark my words.
 
I reckon with all the changes under the hood that 10.7 (or even OS X 11.0 as it may turn out to be!) is going to be an equivalent change as OS 9 to OS X was.

Apple have something planned. Mark my words.

you reckon they have held stuff back from this release for the next one then ?? guess they would but sucks for us
 
Annoyingly my MBP 3,1 which has a C2D, Santa Rosa (+4GB), and EFI64 is refusing to boot into 64 bit mode. I've tried the 6+4 press, the Boot.plist and the nvram commands but SL just continues to boot into 32 bit.

I may do a complete fresh install - remove all the old kext such as the m-Audio, Reason etc. Just incase that's causing an issue.

Supposedly, from research - everything would work except Apple decided that the 64bit starts with 4,1..
 
Last edited:
I reckon with all the changes under the hood that 10.7 (or even OS X 11.0 as it may turn out to be!) is going to be an equivalent change as OS 9 to OS X was.

Apple have something planned. Mark my words.
Doesn't really make sense - OS 9 to OS X was about a fresh start because OS 9 sucked.
 
Coverflow in Finder is well fast now. Quick enough to actually use on a perma basis. I likes the finder rewrite!
 
Well mine arrived this morning to my surprise, I thought it was going to be next week. People seem to be a little underwhelmed but for the £8 I paid for it I shouldn't have any complaints.

Going to install it after I finish my brew.
 
Annoyingly my MBP 3,1 which has a C2D, Santa Rosa (+4GB), and EFI64 is refusing to boot into 64 bit mode. I've tried the 6+4 press, the Boot.plist and the nvram commands but SL just continues to boot into 32 bit.

I may do a complete fresh install - remove all the old kext such as the m-Audio, Reason etc. Just incase that's causing an issue.

My Macbook is doing exactly the same, I tried an upgrade install first and then a wipe HDD and fresh install but no joy yet. :(

I'm giving up for now as I have loads to do for the rest of the weekend....
 
This has probably been asked in this thread, but..

Do normal 32bit apps, with no '64bit' support such as Firefox, Unison etc work when in the full 64bit kernel?
 
Yes. Some of Apple's own applications do not have 64 bit versions (like iTunes).

I wonder (unfounded) if switching back and forth between booting with the 32/64bit kernel is going to have any undesired effects?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom