But it is possible to get more out of a consoles hardware. Although that's just because they have a fixed spec rather than because of the OS.Weebull said:It might make your precious games every so slightly slower on your beastly rigs, but programming games is so much easier for windows than it is for consoles, that I'm glad it's the way it is.
I agree. I think the small performance hit XP has is worth it for the ease of going into a game, coming out, browsing the web, going into another game, etc.Weebull said:Oh don't get me wrong, consoles have their place, but I just think that the ease of programming PC games is such a great bonus, and gives a useful platform for so many smaller developers, that I think it's ridiculous to want to get rid of that just to gain an extra 5-10fps (if that) in some top-notch eye-candy blockbuster.
james.miller said:windows uses very little resources anyway when your gaming. hell im sitting here right now and my cpu usage is spiking to an unbelievable....4%. ram is the only thing that windows can really eat up while your gaming, but most of us have plenty of ram anyway.
Personally, i see no point in it.
No of course not. But I think the point people are making is that we'd be able to get more for our money because we would be getting more out of our hardware.jim5000 said:Would a 'gamer' os even stop everyone from buying the latest graphics cards and cpu?