Thin computing for gamers

There is a kind of alternative that I tried to use called StreamMyGame, which is a cheaper alternative. Instead of streaming from a third party computer over the internet, it lets you stream over a network instead (Though internet streaming is possible).

However... its fairly naff. You need to pay a subscription if you want to get decent resolutions, which is fair enough, but the software doesn't seem too good. The free trial doesn't show up many of the problems since you're playing in such a small window, but even on my 130mbps wireless network at 1280x760 WoW is unplayable, its like its not sending the information fast enough or something.

http://img831.imageshack.us/img831/5199/stream.jpg

If it worked properly, it would be awesome, as I could play games on my laptop and htpc easily, just streaming them from my gaming PC upstairs, and unlike onlive I'd be able to run whatever mods I'd like, and as you're dealing with a LAN, there would be no real latancy issues. Apparnetly some of these issues are 64-bit issues, thoguh either way their website is pretty awful, and dev feedback is pretty much nil, they are silent, and I don't think its been updated in years.

So... this is probably the best alternative, but I wouldn't advise paying for it as the devs don't seem to care about it. If someone could create something like SMG, and just make it work, I'd happily pay for it.
Also, I should note that SMG does let you stream games over the internet like OnLive, but I imagine this would be awful compared with OnLive's service because nobody's upstream bandwidth would be able to stream the video at a decent resolution.
 
Its worth noting that most games only run at 720p on consoles.. and considering this isnt aime at the high-end PC fan market (who already have good enough hardware for all there games) the bandwidth requirement is less.. So id refrain from worrying about full 1080p bandwidth.. and worry more about input latency which is still high for most games.
 
Do not want

I have a PC thats good enough to play games, that may well be cheaper in the long run :p

also I struggle to get ping under 60 at the current rate....this might be over 500 :eek:

UKs lines are not ready for this kind of load, also it falls to server side.

reminds me of when virgin first started doing 50meg...too many people = couldn't cope.
 
Well your ping is still going to be higher than if you connect directly through a server.
Instead of going You - Game Server - You
It'll be: You - Cloud server - Game server - Cloud server - You

Unless when you play on onlive it only lets you play with others also playing on onlive, where it'll be the: "You - Game server - You" situation again because they will host their own, but having something like that will totally segregate the gaming community so people can't play together unless they buy the same service.

Aye thats a good point... the whole thing sounds like it'd be awesome in theory but in practice its not feasible technically and companies just wouldn't make the compromises necessary to make it work. Maybe a very long way down the line...

In all likelihood it just sounds like something Activision would try and set up so they can charge what the hell they like...
 
Awesome in Sweden/Japan/Latvia etc, terrible in the UK.

Although Be There offered me bonding on my ADSL2+ line, should end up with around 36mb down and 3.2mb up. Shame it's £60 a month!
 
Back
Top Bottom