——The Official Battlefield 6 Thread——

I play at 3440x1440p and everything on Ultra with DLSS/FG I get a minimum of 165fps, never dropping below that

AMD 9800X3D 5425mhz: Noctua NH-D15S, Asus TUF Gaming X670E-Plus , 64gb 6000mhz Corsair DDR5, Superflower 850 PSU, Zotac White RTX OC 4080 Super (+120mhz/+1000mhz)
Not too shabby, with DLSS and MFG on, I was getting well over 200fps, most commonly up around 254fps @ 3440x1440 with everything (except for the usual horrors, blur, dof etc) on max, I've a lower cpu than you but I do have a 5070TI which has frankly blown me away lately, that MFG seems nuts. In the end though I turned off DLSS and MFG and found that I was actually far better in combat without them and still hit over 100fps anyway.

Whilst I have faults with BF6, I cant fault the performance
 
Last edited:
Not too shabby, with DLSS and MFG on, I was getting well over 200fps, most commonly up around 254fps @ 3440x1440 with everything (except for the usual horrors, blur, dof etc) on max, I've a lower cpu than you but I do have a 5070TI which has frankly blown me away lately, that MFG seems nuts. In the end though I turned off DLSS and MFG and found that I was actually far better in combat without them and still hit over 100fps anyway.

Whilst I have faults with BF6, I cant fault the performance

In 2024 having DLSS on, gave some latency. So this might be the reason you are better in combat without it.

I'm capped at 164 for improved latency on my 165hz GSYNC monitor though :D
 
Last edited:
Just played some 2042 and it's immediate the difference between that and BF6.

2042 feels like you're moving through treacle. The visuals look sterile and fake. The operators are seriously annoying too with their repetitive cringe voice lines and animations. Also one of them looks like a 65 year old woman.

Hurry up October.
 
I would say that’s well in the ball park.
well the 4070TI is roughly the equivalent of a 3090 I think and that's getting 70+ fps WITHOUT dlss at 4k apparently???

I noticed that the ssao setting was not on the max even with the ultra preset and I had forced that to the max. If those benchmarks are just using the pure ultra preset then that might be the reason my performance is lower that that chart suggests it should be.
 
I cant believe that I am asking this, but how the **** do I load a game up :o
You can't, the first weekend finished 9am this morning. Next one this Thursday 9am UK.
4HQ846T.png

4cy6ken.png
 
Last edited:
I cant believe that I am asking this, but how the **** do I load a game up :o
Well you've got to wait till the 14th now but you go to Play and then Feature and then choose the game mode you want. Then your at the mercy of the matchmaking :-(

TBF its not that obvious, I was looking for a little while thinking this would be so much better with a server browser
 
Well i loved the beta from what i played, defo best battlefield game since bf4 for me....when me and my bro squadded up together and had another 2 decent squad members it felt absolutely amazing!

Honestly, havent had as much fun on a fps in years, runs great, plays great, looks great, ttk is spot on for me....did encounter a couple of bugs but was rare and to be expected in a beta.

Things are looking very promising indeed and will be a defo buy for me
 
Well after a great weekend of BF6 beta , I for one cannot wait for the release.

Is there anything you would like added if it was possible. For me, the only things I'd like to see are maybe ammo stations (always running out) and maybe a blast from the past the Commander.
 
Well after a great weekend of BF6 beta , I for one cannot wait for the release.

Is there anything you would like added if it was possible. For me, the only things I'd like to see are maybe ammo stations (always running out) and maybe a blast from the past the Commander.
Only 3 requests for me

1) Bigger Maps
2) 20% reduction in all movement
3) Server Browser

Do those 3 things and I'd buy it.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom