——The Official Battlefield 6 Thread——

For me it's all about cpu performance. I had to cap fps at 90 to make the game playable on Intel 265K otherwise it's at 100% constantly. If they don't fix that I don't think I can bring myself to buy it.

I could list other stuff, but I don't want to dilute this point. #1 issue imo.
 
Finners said:
No need, there is an option in the settings to enable it in game. Can have a graph showing frame time and stuff to.
Click to expand...
It's also the same one you'd get from the command line on previous BF games (on 2042 it was just a show_fps_1 and show_fps_0) so it looks like they've just taken that and actually built it into the options!
 
Cully said:
Your not burning your GPU they are designed to run at 100% [might cost you a few cent in your electricity bill at worst]
I can scroll through menus fine.
I have no issues rebinding anything to anywhere.
There is nothing wrong with M&K or input, watch this video at 14:38.


Click to expand...
Nothing wrong with my input?

Ok then why is the co efficient set to 133 by default (for 4:3) when for 16:9 should be 178 and for 21:9 should be 233?

I play at 3440x1440 so 133 was way off..

I told you it was off and was prob down to this setting, I changed mine on Saturday and immediately felt the difference..

Now tactical brit is late to the party and saying the same thing..

I'm really sensitive to stuff like this, and know when it's not right, as I have a very good aim and feel of the input..
 
Tombstone said:
Only 3 requests for me

1) Bigger Maps
2) 20% reduction in all movement
3) Server Browser

Do those 3 things and I'd buy it.
Click to expand...
Pretty much what I'd like but I don't think we're going to see 2 or 3 at all and it looks like maps won't be much bigger than what we've seen already. I've uninstalled and won't be buying it.
 
Dont get that you guys find this that fast lol i think 2042 is faster paced than this, its just the maps are bigger so dosnt seem it, think there will be a couple of bigger maps on launch and a server browser would be nice, but not a deal breaker or anything.

Absolutely loved playing the beta myself and its a day 1 buy for me, your all grumpy old gits hahahaha
 
AAA pricing for a AA game, It really feels like it has a b grade polish to it. Really jarring lol
 
syks said:
Dont get that you guys find this that fast lol i think 2042 is faster paced than this, its just the maps are bigger so dosnt seem it, think there will be a couple of bigger maps on launch and a server browser would be nice, but not a deal breaker or anything.

Absolutely loved playing the beta myself and its a day 1 buy for me, your all grumpy old gits hahahaha
Click to expand...
Not grumpy, we just know what we want from a Battlefield game and going off the beta it felt more like COD with vehicles as an after thought. I don't have much faith in DICE anymore, it feels they want to recreate the BF3/4 experience because they were popular but the current devs at DICE don't really know why.

On a positive note it does sound like more recoil is being added to the latest build of the game, now if they could patch the beta with some of the updates/improvements they speak about that would be great but I don't think they will.
 
Locky said:
I think its broken as DLSS hardly increased performance for me and caused crashing..

frame gen did ZERO to increase frame rate..
Click to expand...
I had the same thing at first. No matter what I changed, it made no difference. I think you need to change the Perfomance preset to custom for it to all work (bit of a guess as I was randomly playing with stuff and suddenly FG worked)
 
For those that want to play a Battlefield game like BF4? Go and play BF4. For those that want a modern take on the Battlefield genre? BF6 is for you.

Question for the "It plays like COD" complainers. Have you guys actually played COD recently? If you haven't then your comment is pretty bloody stupid. The pacing soldier speed in particular in BF6 is considerably slower than COD. My dude felt like he was running through treacle, though each footstep did feel weighty compared to COD. Weapons switching in BF6 is a lot slower, as is ADS speed. BF6 guns have more recoil. The comment that todays BF plays like todays COD is just wrong.

It is actually insane to suggest they are the same.
 
Last edited:
Locky said:
I think its broken as DLSS hardly increased performance for me and caused crashing..

frame gen did ZERO to increase frame rate..
Click to expand...
I'll have abit more time on the next play test to mess around with settings - hopefully determine whether I want to upgrade my GPU or not :cry:
 
[timko] said:
You can't, the first weekend finished 9am this morning. Next one this Thursday 9am UK.
4HQ846T.png

4cy6ken.png
Click to expand...
no hint if any of promised fixes are in the next open beta? Shotguns, recoil, scope glint?
 
alec said:
no hint if any of promised fixes are in the next open beta? Shotguns, recoil, scope glint?
Click to expand...
I can't imagine there'll be any gameplay changes tbh. They'll have sooooo much data to trawl over from this weekend's games that they won't have time to properly make the changes and test them (for game breaking bugs) before this weekend's beta 2.
 
I was lucky enough to play this months ago via the Battle labs but hadn't played for ages so was pleased to play the Beta.

I found certain guns suited me better than others, the AR's are very good but the LMG's were also a lot of fun.

Glad they have small maps again, King of the Hill was great but did get a little campy at times.

I also played this on a PS5 Pro and was surprised how well it ran on there even on the big maps.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom