The standalone players are now getting ahead of the ps3 in terms of picture quality etc.
sry but that is an opinion, and I for one do not agree. I was acually considering buying a stand alone player to bit stream HD audio to amp. Compared with Pana BD35, 55, Sony 350 and 550, Pio LX51 and LX71. And could not see any difference in PQ in HD. In the end I didn't buy any since none was better than PS3 - they were the same.
The difference in BD players is not HD but other cappabilities. Audio playback (SACD... * the early 60gb ps3 model has that but I have the 40gb which doesnt), setting adjustments, bitstream HD audio, profile etc...
The Sony remains the most future proof (many firmware updates etc...), streaming/media player, internet, games, decodes all HD audio formats, HDD and fastest loading. Others (not talking about entry lvl BD players) have the edge in terms of audio (jitters, SACD, setting adjust). As for entry lvl BD players the adv is obviously price, quietness of operations, and DVD multiregion; however not all decode HD DTS MA audio. But as far HD sound and PQ for blu rays they all are the same. Perceived differences in HD are placebo imo.
I personally am keeping my PS3 for now and will wait for the upcoming Oppo Blu Ray player for it's superior DVD upscaling, SACD and multiregion DVD -> but that is rumoured to gonna cost about £500 to £600.