I used whatever was posted at the time by Gregster, so probably a techpowerup review. They run their test benches with pretty low clocked CPUs.
Heaven is also very GPU demanding at 1080, so i was surprised by only 75% more demanding instead of a more linear performance requirement.
I'll have to test 1080 vs 1440 tomorrow, pretty sure my monitor is still upstairs gathering dustI'll be able to run my CPU at a high clock to avoid as best possible any bottleneck.
Heaven is very demanding on GPUs but what is interesting about the runs I did was the 1600p result, it is slightly better than could be predicted. If you double the pixels going from 1080 to 1600p then the result at 1600p should be half what it is at 1080p. I think this is due to the lower number of frames @1600p so the less number of times the GPU has to communicate with the CPU resulting in a slightly higher score than expected. Well that's my theory anyway.
