This years Top 100 sexiest women

Otacon said:
Lucky for you then, but they aren't mutually exclusive :)

well, if i didnt find them sexy then their attractiveness would be in question.

The only exception to that is the older woman who i can see WOULDV'E been attractive years ago - thats not so sexy (but when she WOULDV@E been attractive bet she was sexy?)
 
Otacon said:
Lucky for you then, but they aren't mutually exclusive :)

Case in point was that ex-Sugababe bint. In a line-up, you wouldn't have touched her with someone elses... but on the dance floor? No question.

Agreed again. This is becoming a habit now. Say something stupid that I can disagree with :p
 
Pug said:
well, if i didnt find them sexy then their attractiveness would be in question.
Why? :confused:

The prettiest girl on the planet could throw up in your face. Hella not sexy, but she would still be pretty (although perhaps smell bad).

Davey_Pitch said:
Agreed again. This is becoming a habit now. Say something stupid that I can disagree with :p
Real men aren't afraid to wear pink.
 
Otacon said:
Lucky for you then, but they aren't mutually exclusive :)

Case in point was that ex-Sugababe bint. In a line-up, you wouldn't have touched her with someone elses... but on the dance floor? No question.

The Sugababes are greater than the sum of their parts, when the three of them are together you can just taste it, but put one of them on her own and the effect is lost.
 
Tru said:
The Sugababes are greater than the sum of their parts, when the three of them are together you can just taste it, but put one of them on her own and the effect is lost.
I do agree, but I still think she'd have enough to convince anyone. Cant take your eyes off any of them when they start dancing.
 
well, i guess the misunderstanding might stem from the fact that to be attractive in my opinion that includes the whole body

just face the face? Thats pretty.
 
Tru said:
The Sugababes are greater than the sum of their parts, when the three of them are together you can just taste it, but put one of them on her own and the effect is lost.

Not so true of Siobhan Donaghy. I still think she's pretty great ;)

Libs - it's not a case of not minding girls with smaller breasts who are thin, to me the two aren't necessarily connected. Breast size is fairly irrelevant when compared to everything else to me, but I just can't get excited about a girl where you can see her ribcage and her arms are as thin as most peoples fingers. It kind of smacks of emotional problems to me.
 
Pug said:
well, i guess the misunderstanding might stem from the fact that to be attractive in my opinion that includes the whole body
Ok then, replace 'pretty' with 'perfect figure'.

It's not what you've got, it's how you use it.
 
Jive-Zombie said:
I just have one question. How the hell did Nicola from Girls Aloud get anywhere near the top 100? Holy Hell! *pukes*
She may have no soul, but she ain't that bad!

04r13cv.jpg
 
She's never been the muntest Girl Aloud. She was top 3 from day one in my book (out of the 5 of them, not in this poll).
 
Otacon said:
I do agree, but I still think she'd have enough to convince anyone. Cant take your eyes off any of them when they start dancing.

I once tried to eat breakfast while watching the video for Push The Button. The toast was cold by the time I actually got round to eating any of it.
 
Rich_L said:
She may have no soul, but she ain't that bad!

04r13cv.jpg


Not bad not bad at all, nice body on her...nice rack, legs and heels as well. Put a paper bag over her head and your sorted :p
 
That list is so wrong :rolleyes: #1 i can agree with shes pretty hot but some real bad people imo in it. God knows what coleen is doing it it, altho she has lost quite a lot of weight still doesnt deserve to be in it at all!!!

Tweedy isnt that nice either, she looks a bit bland :p nothing to special about her

*runs from da_mic*

Billie piper is alright dunno if should be be that high either. I also dont think beyonce is that nice either.
 
Back
Top Bottom