Thoughts on Taylor Swift?

she is gash, give it a year or 2 and she'll be doing a brtiney by flashing her kitty while getting out of a car for some publicity..............
 
Her music is not massively terrible- well, my other half bought her album and I haven't forcibly ejected it from my car CD player at any rate.

Her looks don't really do it for me though.

Was she originally part of disney? Or dating someone who was on Disney? They all mush together into a massive pile of indifference and Meh tbh.

Edit- I also like that she doesn't feel the need to flash as much skin as most famous ladies do!
 
Last edited:
glen8 said:
6-12 months ago I think
Click to expand...

Really? Interesting. I remember the name Taylor Swift back to maybe, the late 00s? It was never a name I was fully aware of though. Just like Jess Glynne, Jessie Ware and Rae Morris. The Pierces is another one that is starting to climb the ladder.
 
Raymond Lin said:
She is much more switched on than Britney. For one thing, she owns the rights to all her songs as she wrote all of them (or at least co-wrote).

She also has a big share of her own record company.

She has released an album every 2 years for the past 10 years and did a world tour on 4 of them. Many times playing in stadiums the size of Wembley and selling out, making a lot of money in the process.

She has some stupid record like youngest ever Grammy winner (18), youngest ever to be inducted to the CMA Hall of Fame, her Wiki page make some scary viewing on stats alone and she's only 25.

I find the people that tend to write her off as another Britney is judging the book by its cover, and this isn't the first time I've seen this. I start listening to her music back in 2009 and some people have said her 15 minutes of fame will be over soon.

We are in 2015 and she is the biggest star in the world arguably. I've said before back then let's see who's still be around in 10 years' time. I guess we can do that again. I won't be betting against her though.
Click to expand...
would that be the record company her daddy bought so she could have a music career?
 
I'm not sure why people seem to be in love with her looks/body. She has nice (although skinny) legs but aside from that her figure is reminiscent of a 13 year old boy. No ass, no boobs, no waist/hip ratio, average face...

Her music is starting to get boring also. It's the type of music that I like for about the first 3 times I hear it on the radio, then it just starts to grate on me.
 
arknor said:
would that be the record company her daddy bought so she could have a music career?
Click to expand...

A record company at the time that worked/based out of a suburban house, whom she left SONY for.

One could argue having share in your own company gives you an advantage over another singer who does not. The argument is that does not equal record sales, particularly it is not a major record label, there are no massive PR campaign and also you are then running your own career, not the record company running yours. Which shows business sense and why also she earns so much money.

All the more reason she is not another Britney.
 
glen8 said:
6-12 months ago I think
Click to expand...

That's when she released her first Pop album, she started with county music, sold out Madison Square garden back in 1999 for her first tour in 1 minute and sold out the stadium where the New England Patriots plays as well in the same tour.
 
Got quite a soft spot for her. I like some of her songs and I think she is beautiful and pulls off the classic/elegant look very well.

She's also worth about half a billion dollars so yh... :D
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom