tiled floor advice

Soldato
Joined
28 Nov 2002
Posts
11,298
Location
Cumbria
I've got a stripped down upstairs bathroom that I want to eventually tile , I have decent sized joists although not sure how level they are, on top of that are some old floorboards that are about 22mm thick, these are not in the best shape and nailed down.

I'd also want to minimize any height differences with adjoining hallway

What would be the best way forward ?

I'm hearing different opinions so unsure
 
No need to go overboard. Remember that one may need to gain access under the floor at some point!
 
I ripped out my floor boards and went for 18mm structural ply. Bal Tanking. Level It 2 part flexible self leveling compound. UFH embedded in that then tiled onto that. Overall height is around 15mm so will easily match up with underlay/carpet in the hallway :)
 
I ripped out my floor boards and went for 18mm structural ply. Bal Tanking. Level It 2 part flexible self leveling compound. UFH embedded in that then tiled onto that. Overall height is around 15mm so will easily match up with underlay/carpet in the hallway :)

Thing is, what if you need to gain access under the floor?
 
If the joists bounce what can I do?

Or would I be better just leaving the floor and getting a decent quality vinyl or laminate?
 
Struggling to find any 22mm wbp local to me

I thought about tanking as a precaution

I'm just hoping tearing up the floorboards isn't going to end up a mistake heh
 
So after having a good think about it I will probably rip out the floorboards, lay some 18mm ply and then lay some cement boards

My question now is... should I do the whole room now why it is bare and backer board the lot, or lay the ply, fit bathroom then lay the backer board around everything

Ps. Theres no ceiling below so plenty of access underneath
 
Not wanting to hijack this thread, but it's already useful to what we're looking to do.

We're currently planning on ripping out the existing bathroom and then fitting a new suite (and layout) and tiling.

We're currently looking to minimise the amount of work we get done by professionals and so my plan was to:

* Rip out and dispose of existing stuff (tiles, suite, etc)
* Re-plaster walls (we have someone who can do this as a favour)
* Get new suite fitted and plumbed in
* Tile (floor and half height walls)

My question is, does this order make sense? Should we be getting someone to tile around the newly fitted suite, or should we be getting it tiled first and then fitting?
 
No need to go overboard. Remember that one may need to gain access under the floor at some point!

Id be going up through the ceiling downstairs before going through tiles screed and UFH.

The need arose from having a poorly fitted wetroom previously. This time you could fill the bathroom with water if you block off the door:D
 
Not wanting to hijack this thread, but it's already useful to what we're looking to do.

We're currently planning on ripping out the existing bathroom and then fitting a new suite (and layout) and tiling.

We're currently looking to minimise the amount of work we get done by professionals and so my plan was to:

* Rip out and dispose of existing stuff (tiles, suite, etc)
* Re-plaster walls (we have someone who can do this as a favour)
* Get new suite fitted and plumbed in
* Tile (floor and half height walls)

My question is, does this order make sense? Should we be getting someone to tile around the newly fitted suite, or should we be getting it tiled first and then fitting?

I would always tile first. It's far easier, gives a better seal, looks neater and future proofs in case you ever change your suite.

Generally you should always do the walls/floors/ceilings first then fit the fixtures and fittings.
 
Back
Top Bottom