• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Time for a CPU upgrade

Associate
Joined
24 Feb 2003
Posts
338
Location
Doncaster
Hi,

I currently have a A64 3700+ and i'm thinking it maybe upgrade time :)

I'm stuck between getting a Q6600 or a E8400. (or anything else I should be looking at in that price range?)

I play games mostly, very little else.

Now, here's the thing. I have no intention whatsoever in overclocking any CPU I buy :o

I know that may shock a few of you guys but please keep it in mind :D

So what do you recommend?

Thanks for your time.
 
Crikey! as it seems you don't upgrade very often I would probably get:

  • Wolfdale E8400 - Dual Core 3GHz 6MB Cache
  • Kentsfield Q6600 - Quad Core 2.4GHz 8MB Cache
  • Yorkfield Q9450 - Quad Core 2.66GHz 12MB Cache
An E8400 would be a really good upgrade for you but if your not gonna change CPU again for another few years then the Quad will serve you well. I grayed out the older tech Kentsfield because I feel the Yorkfield is a better long term purchase and the premium you pay for it over the older quad would be recouped in time through cheaper leccy bills. :cool:
 
for gaming i'd stick with duel core as no games use quad & u'd have 2 cores constantly idleing. but others may disagree with me
 
for gaming i'd stick with duel core as no games use quad & u'd have 2 cores constantly idleing. but others may disagree with me

I understand that but like the first guy said, I don't upgrade very often!

I was reading a review of a game that said a dual core CPU was minimum spec! (think it was assasins creed?) which kinda made me think "omg how old is my rig!"

now I don't wanna buy a dual core then find out in 12 months time that 4 cores is minimum spec :D

How likely is that to happen?
 
Out of interest, if you have a quad core running a game that is dual core only, would the game have two cores to itself, with windows stuff running on the remaining cores?
 
i'd be supprised if that happenes, there's still a large number of people still using single core CPU's, most of those in the college group i'm in are still using single core PC's!
 
Back
Top Bottom