• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Time Spy Standard DX 12 Bench.

I was thinking that too lol. That's Fury pro crossfire gpu score.

It's not crossfire hence the (1) next to the name. I think there's a loophole that AMDMatt's taking advantage of with the Duo where by turning one chip off he has an advantage over even the regular Fury X thanks to the power that's available.

That's why you see Duo(1) results in the single card lists and practically no Duo results in any of the 2 way lists.

EDIT: Thanks Kaap.
 
Here are my scores with a Xeon E3 1230 V2 and a Gigabyte GTX960 4GB:

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13912960

Score 2 319 with NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960(1x) and Intel Xeon Processor E3-1230V2

Graphics Score
2 181

CPU Score
3 620

zxc.png
 
Last edited:
Just a quick question on 3D mark, why does it have different results for your clocks then GPUz or ThunderMaster (Palit's monitoring tool) On my 1070 my boost clock never crosses 1950, and my core clock is 1726, but yet 3D mark says my core clock is 2088 and my boost clock is 2132.
 
Updated bench: Previous score was 7171

i7 4790k @ 4.6
gtx 1080 core 2114 mem 2740
drivers 368.81

Score: 7303
Graphics: 7921
CPU: 5065

http://www.3dmark.com/3dm/13918788


On another note 16579 points.. holy -redacted- !
That should get you well clear of 100fps in witcher 3 at 4K with everything on, there isnt even a monitor that can handle that ammount of GPU power.
 
Back
Top Bottom