Titanfall Benchmarks

shankly1985 · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:05

Gregster said:
Dunno but looking at the countless flaws in Matt's bench (That Humbug egged him on to post), I am certainly not taking his serious. A 660 just behind a 770??? A 680 4GB beating a 770 massively but not a single sign of VRAM limitations...

Can't be that bad, as I have one of them as a screensaver but glad you took the time to post how bad they looked in my thread.

Honestly You think this looks good? Res might be great 4k am not dissing that at all mate but look at them Textures etc there just not ready for 4K the Engine is far to dated.

LtMatt · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:06

Gregster said:
Dunno but looking at the countless flaws in Matt's bench (That Humbug egged him on to post), I am certainly not taking his serious. A 660 just behind a 770??? A 680 4GB beating a 770 massively but not a single sign of VRAM limitations...

PCH are reliable so i trust their results. People doubting the results should read the review if in doubt as it explains their testing and what happened. They even post the benchmark scene they used which is different (and looks a lot more demanding) than the scenet GameGPU benched.

shankly1985 · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:07

MjFrosty said:
I said it will likely look good with TXAA and that it looks fairly flat at the moment.

Should or gone to spec savers.

TBH though it doesn't look that bad. What are you even comparing it to?

Anti analysing isn't going to change the fact the Engine is dated lol textures will still be dated looking. AA isn't going to change anything apart from make edges look better.

Silent_Scone · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:09

Have you used TXAA before.

Tonester0011 · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:09

LtMatt said:
PCH are reliable so i trust their results. People doubting the results should read the review if in doubt as it explains their testing and what happened. They even post the benchmark scene they used which is different (and looks a lot more demanding) than the scenet GameGPU benched.

Isn't this your go to response though?
You 'trust' their results, their benchmark is also 'more demanding' lol.

Silent_Scone · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:12

Like that spot in BF4 that's reaaaallly cpu limited. Lol. I honestly don't think Titanfall looks that bad. It's a fast paced shooter so there isn't much point lumbering performance on slower systems for the sake of some fancy weather effects or the like.

LtMatt · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:12

Tonester0011 said:
Isn't this your go to response though?
You 'trust' their results, their benchmark is also 'more demanding' lol.

If you can prove they're not to be trusted then go right ahead. I've never seen any evidence of that in any of their posted results in other games.

shankly1985 · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:14

MjFrosty said:
Have you used TXAA before.

Seen screenshots am I wrong in saying it's just another form AA?? Sorry if I wrong but from what I seeing it's nothing more than another AA
It doesn't add anything else?

Am I wrong? here to learn also I dont know everything

Gregster · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:15

LtMatt said:
PCH are reliable so i trust their results. People doubting the results should read the review if in doubt as it explains their testing and what happened. They even post the benchmark scene they used which is different (and looks a lot more demanding) than the scenet GameGPU benched.

First it was GameGPU who were the "Trusted ones" from you but they have posted something that doesn't suit your argument and you then play the "PCH are the trusted ones". Ohhhh Lawdddd, it is pathetic and degrading to switch about bench sites, just because you don't like what you see.

Edited - Com'n Gregser, you know better than that.

GameGPU or PCH, I don't care who is right or wrong and people who play the game seem to be happy with it in the most.

humbug · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:17

shankly1985 said:
TitanFall look good? you joking right? The game looks Ugly and really dated.

shankly1985 said:
Gameplay is also phoo its just far to easy. Point and hold button with zero effect on your aim.
Dont get me wrong its an ok game but thats only because they nothing else out there like it. If they would have made it more challenging etc it would have made thing so much better.

MjFrosty said:
I said it will likely look good with TXAA and that it looks fairly flat at the moment.

I'm not reading a lot of love for this Game, is it worth it or not?

Silent_Scone · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:19

shankly1985 said:
Seen screenshots am I wrong in saying it's just another form AA?? Sorry if I wrong but from what I seeing it's nothing more than another AA
It doesn't add anything else?

Am I wrong? here to learn also I dont know everything

Surprise. I didn't say it makes the game look better than Frost Bite or that it's the best thing side sliced bread did I?

Yes, it's a better form of AA. And by better I mean it looks genuinely better. So by definition it's not the same.

shankly1985 · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:21

MjFrosty said:
Surprise. I didn't say it makes the game look better than Frost Bite or that it's the best thing side sliced bread did I?

Yes, it's a better form of AA. And by better I mean it looks genuinely better. So by definition it's not the same.

Dont like Battlefield lol its an ok game and I jump on now and then. I would much rather play Insurgency or CSGO.

shankly1985 · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:25

Just giving my thoughts on the game and dont think 4K does it anything good.

Tonester0011 · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:32

shankly1985 said:
Just giving my thoughts on the game and dont think 4K does it anything good.

It's probably because you're not infront of the screen though mate

Try resizing the images to fit your screen, full screen. Rather the viewing them enlarged and having to scroll around to find things.

blky · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:33

i wonder how they are benching these as well

Tonester0011 · 30 Mar 2014 at 15:56

The games been out ages, yet we're only now seeing a benchmark thread, even though GameGPU posted one - 2 weeks ago! Time to put tin foil hats on guys, but i reckon that wasn't posted because it doesn't show AMD having a lead

Silent_Scone · 30 Mar 2014 at 16:53

* edited *

humbug said:
I'm not reading a lot of love for this Game, is it worth it or not?

I'd say very much so if you can get it for under £30. It's a great time passer, and the genre has been missing a fast paced shooter. It's a lot of fun, but obviously some peoples idea of fun is different from others. *Cough* Dota 2.

shankly1985 · 30 Mar 2014 at 17:24

I got it for free

it's a good game but nothing special I find it to easy and no challenge. So becomes boring fast.
Like above if you can get cheap go for it.

Admiral Huddy · 31 Mar 2014 at 08:53

Some old same old eh? What is it with some of you?

Discuss, debate and even argue if you must, but don't make things personal. Some of you should know better by now and those that should are being kept a very close eye on and tread a thin line.

You've been warned.