V1N said:Now Now, there's nothing broken about my 16:10 weird-ass ratio nonsense![]()
only 2 ratios worth dealing with: 4:3 and 16:9 anyone running anything else is a fool.

V1N said:Now Now, there's nothing broken about my 16:10 weird-ass ratio nonsense![]()


Cyber-Mav said:only 2 ratios worth dealing with: 4:3 and 16:9 anyone running anything else is a fool.![]()
Indeed - But you get more pixels on-screen with 1280 x 1024.Daytrader said:whats really strange is that 1280 x 1024 should not really be used on a 4.3 screen as it stretches stuff, the true res should be 1280 x 960 true 4.3![]()

fobose said:I think 1920x1200 would be one of the least used resolutions, 1024x768 and 1280x1024 would probabilly be quite highly used though.

james.miller said:good job these screens are 5:4 then, eh?
Danzla, honestly...how on earth can you think 1920x1200 is a popular resolution. how many people actually own a 24" widescreen lcd??

digisatman said:
InvaderGIR said:Well for starters taking a screenie of what it looks like is pointless, you'll have to take a photo of the monitor, they both look clean, clear and crisp to me on my VX922 (at 1280x1024 I might add).
InvG