Either a troll, or genuine extreme right-wing authoritarianism, not sure.
He's from Scotland. He can't help himself.
Either a troll, or genuine extreme right-wing authoritarianism, not sure.
Do you agree with the Greens policy on citrus fruit ?
I'm not aware of the Green party's stance on citrus fruit.
Either a troll, or genuine extreme right-wing authoritarianism, not sure.
Why?
I'm sure the inhabitants of Easter Island said "Why?" too.
The earth 's biosphere does not have infinite resources.
Sue has three children with Tim then gets divorced. Bob has a child with Lucy then gets divorced.
Bob and Sue get married. Do they now receive child benefit for all four children? Or does the state penalise them for getting married? If they do get the benefit, do they then get more child benefit if they have a child together because it is Bob's second child or not because it is Sue's fourth child?
If Sue married and thus becomes legal guardian of four children as a single family unit then of course that will be over the 3 limit... right?
So the Tories plan on penalising people for getting married, then?
If two single parents with 3 children marry, then why should they get 6x child benefits? 3x child benefits + 1 or 2 working salaries should be manageable?
If they don't marry then they carry on getting 6x child benefit so that's a stiff loss of income for getting married. That doesn't seem a desirable feature of any system. Apart from the apparent perversity of it, anything that encourages people not to form stable family units seems like it will be to the detriment of the children and society in general.
If they don't marry then they carry on getting 6x child benefit so that's a stiff loss of income for getting married. That doesn't seem a desirable feature of any system. Apart from the apparent perversity of it, anything that encourages people not to form stable family units seems like it will be to the detriment of the children and society in general.
That's not the way the current benefits system works. The only way they would get all the child benefit is if they were two distinct and separate households. Marriage isn't required to end eligibility.
Of course, the scenario you describe already occurs within the current system via the tax credit system...
Forced abortions after 3 kids, that would stop the poverty?
simple solution anyone living on benefits and not having worked should have the child removed and sterilized. and as for the extra cost of the ageing population if they can't fund their old age with a proper pension should be put to sleep this would reduce the tax burden
we could also move to a pay as you go type model and scrap the huge tax burdeon that is the nhs this would also help with reducing the ageing population
although all of the above are complety insane no more so than current goverment solotions to the problems
simple solution anyone living on benefits and not having worked should have the child removed and sterilized. and as for the extra cost of the ageing population if they can't fund their old age with a proper pension should be put to sleep this would reduce the tax burden
we could also move to a pay as you go type model and scrap the huge tax burdeon that is the nhs this would also help with reducing the ageing population
although all of the above are complety insane no more so than current goverment solotions to the problems
Somehow i doubt losing £13 a week will make any difference to the types who keep popping them out when they can't afford it.
You're either insane or an excellent troll.
You have an active psychotic gene.![]()
No, but it it does have the resources to support a MUCH larger population that it currently has now.
We just need to intelligent about how we use those reources.
I'd rather see legislation that targets the appropriate use of those resources rather than legislation that tries to control family size. Besides, it's been demonstrated that wealthy people have less children and correcting the poor wealth distribution the world currently suffers from would be one way of naturally reducing (rather than enforcing) family size.