Train Crash in Cumbria.

I did some work on both the Pendolinos and the Voyagers a couple of years ago - they are really heavy, solid vehicles. I don't think a Pendolino has ever been in a major derailment anywhere until now so it's good to see how well it took it.
 
mast3r said:
OOPS! wonder who will get the blame for this one?
SOME SORT OR TERRORIST!

There first port of call will be the poor patrol men who is only on 18-19k a year. Huge responsibility for not much money.
 
dbmzk1 said:
Yes, actually they have. Usually its not physically a wheel, often being a handle or joystick type device, but the idea is the same. The driver can physically steer the train.
Do you have any links for further information on this? :p
 
Last edited:
I agree that it's not looking too good for Network Rail's maintenance department.

It is unlikely that the dudes at the bottom will get held responsible - more likely that the company will get shafted for something like 'using inappropriately trained staff' under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.
 
big_white_dog84 said:
It is unlikely that the dudes at the bottom will get held responsible - more likely that the company will get shafted for something like 'using inappropriately trained staff' under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.

Which will do nothing other than take money away from a company so badly in need of it.
 
big_white_dog84 said:
It is unlikely that the dudes at the bottom will get held responsible - more likely that the company will get shafted for something like 'using inappropriately trained staff' under the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974.
Obviously depends on what happen, but network rail have been very good at providing training and once people have been trained for them to sign all work off. Making it easy to shift blame down the chain to the bottom.
 
AcidHell2 said:
There first port of call will be the poor patrol men who is only on 18-19k a year. Huge responsibility for not much money.

Yeah? Try 30-45k buddy. Take it from me. I work for the biggest contractor of them all. They're on stupid money. Depending on their grade of course. They won't let normal apes do inspection work. Btw. It's either Carrilions or Grant Rail's
job. Grant Rail is on their way out and they know it. Perhaps that's why they "missed" the loose bolts. They probably just don't care anymore too give the appropriate amount of time and care the job needs.

Personally, I don't travel on trains. It's always the points and crossings that bother me. The margin for error is ridiculously small. Too small...
 
Last edited:
big_white_dog84 said:
I agree that it's not looking too good for Network Rail's maintenance department.

You do know they sub most of the work out? I doubt NR even know where Cumbria is. Carillion Rail or Grant Rail know though ;)
 
regulus said:
Personally, I don't travel on trains. It's always the points and crossings that bother me. The margin for error is ridiculously small. Too small...

paranoia? It must be one of the safest methods of transport going :confused:
 
Chronos-X said:
paranoia? It must be one of the safest methods of transport going :confused:

Off course paranoia. It's just that when you work with it on a daily basis, you realise how fragile it really is.
 
regulus said:
Off course paranoia. It's just that when you work with it on a daily basis, you realise how fragile it really is.
Ha - yeah, far less fragile that pretty much any other form of transport!
 
dbmzk1 said:
Yes, actually they have. Usually its not physically a wheel, often being a handle or joystick type device, but the idea is the same. The driver can physically steer the train.

:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
Never heard such rubbish in my life.
There is no train, I repeat NO train with any sort of steering device. The handle/ joystick devices you're referring to are simply different ways of controlling the throttle/ brake, depending on precisely who designed the train. There are a few trains (1960's Deutshe Bundesbahn diesel locos spring to mind) which actually have a physical steering wheel, but this is not used for steering, but rather in this case for controlling the brakes.

I agree to a point on how fragile the railway is- By definition, the path which a train can take, and any obstacles that it has to tackle are fixed, and this means that there is actually less toughness required to reach the same level of safety. On the other hand, the railways are certainly one of the safest means of transport via thier sheer predictability.

-Leezer-
 
leezer3 said:
:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek:
Never heard such rubbish in my life.
There is no train, I repeat NO train with any sort of steering device. The handle/ joystick devices you're referring to are simply different ways of controlling the throttle/ brake, depending on precisely who designed the train. There are a few trains (1960's Deutshe Bundesbahn diesel locos spring to mind) which actually have a physical steering wheel, but this is not used for steering, but rather in this case for controlling the brakes.
Damn, I was waiting for a link ;).
 
Back
Top Bottom