I think I have messed up. I have tried to follow some guides but I get lost.
So I have a 2500k and a P67A-UD4. These are some screenshots I will try to explain. I have core temp for monitoring, cpu-z and intel burn test for stressing. I first tried a basic 36 core multiplier with stress. Can anyone explain why CPU-Z shows 1.068 v? Off screen CPU-Z shows 3600 Mhz as it should do as I set it in BIOS, but why is Core Temp showing 3309? Isn't that stock? And why 1.3210v? I understand that the VID is the initial voltage needed to start the PC? This should be lower right to guarantee longer life of the CPU, I think.
http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/3509/sam0313.jpg
Here is the next expert camera shot I took...
http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/6199/sam0314x.jpg
That shows the 3600 overclock. I think I did set 1.200 V as I wanted to see how low I could go for temps, DRAM voltage also shows 1.548 v when I set it to 1.500 in the voltage options....
Now onto some settings
http://img863.imageshack.us/img863/6942/sam0315w.jpg
Everything there is correct besides the low clock ratio right?
I followed those enabled/disabled stuff from a guide.
Next screenshot...
http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/8057/sam0316m.jpg
Now where on earth is it pulling 1.305 from when I stuck it to 1.200 v (what showed on the previous screen). You can also see the 1.500 RAM voltage I set which I mentioned before.
I then set the clock ratio to 41 (changed nothing else) and the vcore went up to 1.340v. Why the increase?
http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/5444/sam0317l.jpg
I then booted into Windows, CPU-Z shows the correct overclock of 4100 but still 1.068v and Core Temp is still a mess. Notice how in first shot it shows 827 x 4 then after a clock ratio change it shows 100 x 33.
http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/6001/sam0318v.jpg
If anyone can read and understand what to fix, I salute you.
So I have a 2500k and a P67A-UD4. These are some screenshots I will try to explain. I have core temp for monitoring, cpu-z and intel burn test for stressing. I first tried a basic 36 core multiplier with stress. Can anyone explain why CPU-Z shows 1.068 v? Off screen CPU-Z shows 3600 Mhz as it should do as I set it in BIOS, but why is Core Temp showing 3309? Isn't that stock? And why 1.3210v? I understand that the VID is the initial voltage needed to start the PC? This should be lower right to guarantee longer life of the CPU, I think.
http://img853.imageshack.us/img853/3509/sam0313.jpg
Here is the next expert camera shot I took...
http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/6199/sam0314x.jpg
That shows the 3600 overclock. I think I did set 1.200 V as I wanted to see how low I could go for temps, DRAM voltage also shows 1.548 v when I set it to 1.500 in the voltage options....
Now onto some settings
http://img863.imageshack.us/img863/6942/sam0315w.jpg
Everything there is correct besides the low clock ratio right?
I followed those enabled/disabled stuff from a guide.
Next screenshot...
http://img715.imageshack.us/img715/8057/sam0316m.jpg
Now where on earth is it pulling 1.305 from when I stuck it to 1.200 v (what showed on the previous screen). You can also see the 1.500 RAM voltage I set which I mentioned before.
I then set the clock ratio to 41 (changed nothing else) and the vcore went up to 1.340v. Why the increase?
http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/5444/sam0317l.jpg
I then booted into Windows, CPU-Z shows the correct overclock of 4100 but still 1.068v and Core Temp is still a mess. Notice how in first shot it shows 827 x 4 then after a clock ratio change it shows 100 x 33.
http://img824.imageshack.us/img824/6001/sam0318v.jpg
If anyone can read and understand what to fix, I salute you.
Last edited: