Turkey Grand Prix 2010, Istanbul Park - Race 7/19

What do the German fans think? Are they still backing their man?

They're used to it.

Why are you surprised, Remember MSC, everyone thought those days where gone. Obviously not, but with every angel and several cameras on each cars and all the telemetry. It's not like teh mid 90's anymore. Internet age means info spreads fast adn wide.
 
When MSc did his "special moves", he generally did so to gain a decisive advantage in the championship.
.

I'm talking about how vettle and even more how the team reacted. Rather than teh actual move itself. Whivh is no where near as cunning as MSC. Nothing more than getting angry and being stupid.
 
Another point that annoys me this year is the crap about saving fuel, why don't they just fill up the cars with enough fuel to go 100% for the full race, it can't make that big of a difference in laptimes, or does it?

It's in a article on the bbc, it does indeed make that much difference, 5to lap times. the idea is to set a fast pace early on to gain your position, then turn the engine down. I'll see if I can dig it out, Sure someone posted it earlier.
 
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/motorsport/formula_one/8714410.stm

One trigger for the problems is that the teams are starting races this year knowing that at some point they must save fuel to get to the finish.

It sounds crazy but it costs a 10th of a second a lap to carry a lap's worth of fuel. In the 58-lap Turkish Grand Prix, that is equivalent to 5.8 seconds.

When we saw the two Red Bulls and the two McLarens all circulating within a total of 2.2 seconds after 40 laps yesterday you can see the relevance.

So the teams under-fill their cars as much as they dare so they are as fast as possible in the crucial early part of the race leading up to the pit stops, knowing they can back the engines off to save fuel when they have secured their track position later on.
 
Do we actually know they under filled?

Or is it possible it was team orders, not to over take. Hence why button ignored it and carried on fighting.
 
Based on the above, the crash was due to Ciaron Pilbeam, not passing on the message to Webber, who thought he was racing Vettel and was allowed to defend.

:confused:

No, it is still vettles fault, no need to move into your team mate on an effective straight.
It's also illegal, so where did you get this from.
 
If the "story" is true, then Vettel had every right to expect that Webber was going to move out of the way. This also explains why he was so p'd off - he would've been told on the radio, "Webber will let you through, go through." (or a code phrase). Then when he went to overtake, Webber resists the overtake, which ends up in a collision.

A) he does not resist, he just does not yield. If he yielded FIA would more than likely investigate team orders. Vettle moved into him on a straight, absolutely no need at that point. Regardless of orders.

B) team orders are against the rules.

I also think if team orders are going to be illegal, any radio comms saying fuel critical or similar, should be be looked at. It would be very easy to tell from the telemetry and rule out cheating.
 
Last edited:
comms are monitored, so it can not be said over the radio in such clear terms, as such webber can not say that's against the rules. As that is telling teh FIA all they need to punish.

Sunama is just blind on this one. There was no need for vettle to come across, regardless what was said on the radio.
 
you keep forgetting team orders are against the rules, The engineer can't not say let vettel through. The best he can say is fuel's critical and save it.

It was 100% vettels fault, there can be no blame on webber or the engineer. Just vettle.

As far as I'm aware FIA did not even investigate it, probably due to it being team mates.

Vettel did not get the shock of his life, webber held his line, a perfect normal thing to do.
 
Last edited:
yep, I am sure that was nothing but team orders. Jenson kept attacking. that would not happen if he thought he wouldn't make it to the end of teh race.

2) McLaren have made a huge jump forward without anything major going on the car, and while Red Bull had a few failures (old engine I believe - so shouldnt have been that big a concern, and a water-intake or somesuch I seem to recall ...not sure exactly how serious this was), I still dont think RB turned the wick down that much to compensate for the McLaren upturn

Duke said:

As in the article, they've only made about half teh time, where RBR have been running illegal aero designs, which have no been removed. Can't believe there so little articles and nothing from the fia.
 
I'll do it on tuesday/Wednesday like normal, just wont be able to update it.
Unless some one wants to grab the 1st reply and update it.
 
what team was it that had the fuel pressurisation system. IIRC they didn't actually prove teh car was under weight at any point, just that it could drop below the minimum weight. Or am I not remembering it correctly. Yet RBR have parts that are clearly Illegal and nothing on the formula1 website or anything else. They also knew hence the crowding of people around it.

I really hopped this season and teh change in fia would bring an end to these silly decisions, but so far we have had MSC stripped of points, despite the fact race control messed up know illegal parts being swept under the carpet. Madness.
 
Last edited:
This is just as damaging to teh sport, as it turns it into a scripted race. That is why the news has been so restricted.

I hope one of teh teams lodge legal action, that would blow the doors of and reveal what a stupid sport this is turning into.

They could at least say it's illegal, do news reports on it and just make them remove it and give them a fat fine.
 
What annoys me is that they're running an aero part that is angled at 20 degrees (the limit is 5 degrees), but instead of telling them to remove it they're allowed to cover it in tubing.

I admit I'm no designer, but surely an illegal part at 20 degrees (covered in tubing) is better than the 5 degree "standard" part?

it's only limited to 5degrees if it's aerodynamic. So a 20degrees plain tube, is perfectly legal.

I amazed that red bull have gotten away with this, but then it's good for the sport to have other winners. I maintain the diffuser on the brawn would have been banned had the fairy tale story not been so high profile.
Difference is a double diffuser isn't against the rules, Brawn also said in meetings before the start of the season, the rule should be tightened. To remove the loop hole.
 
Last edited:
The presidence for RBR keeping their points could have been set with Ferrari and their bouncy floor. This was also illegal, and once discovered banned, but didn't result in Kimi losing the points from Oz when the car was running with it.

Then why the secrecy, why the apparent media ban. why nothing from the FIA about it.

My point wasn't that Honda should have got away with it, but how teh FIA reacted to cheating.
 
Back
Top Bottom