What do the German fans think? Are they still backing their man?
When MSc did his "special moves", he generally did so to gain a decisive advantage in the championship.
.
Another point that annoys me this year is the crap about saving fuel, why don't they just fill up the cars with enough fuel to go 100% for the full race, it can't make that big of a difference in laptimes, or does it?
One trigger for the problems is that the teams are starting races this year knowing that at some point they must save fuel to get to the finish.
It sounds crazy but it costs a 10th of a second a lap to carry a lap's worth of fuel. In the 58-lap Turkish Grand Prix, that is equivalent to 5.8 seconds.
When we saw the two Red Bulls and the two McLarens all circulating within a total of 2.2 seconds after 40 laps yesterday you can see the relevance.
So the teams under-fill their cars as much as they dare so they are as fast as possible in the crucial early part of the race leading up to the pit stops, knowing they can back the engines off to save fuel when they have secured their track position later on.
Based on the above, the crash was due to Ciaron Pilbeam, not passing on the message to Webber, who thought he was racing Vettel and was allowed to defend.
If the "story" is true, then Vettel had every right to expect that Webber was going to move out of the way. This also explains why he was so p'd off - he would've been told on the radio, "Webber will let you through, go through." (or a code phrase). Then when he went to overtake, Webber resists the overtake, which ends up in a collision.
easy way to find out, it would take FIA 5 seconds with telemetry to work out if it was genuine or a team order.That they were low on fuel...
2) McLaren have made a huge jump forward without anything major going on the car, and while Red Bull had a few failures (old engine I believe - so shouldnt have been that big a concern, and a water-intake or somesuch I seem to recall ...not sure exactly how serious this was), I still dont think RB turned the wick down that much to compensate for the McLaren upturn
Duke said:Interesting review - http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2010/06/0...sh-grand-prix/
Yet what do you do, exclude the cars from the points for those races or give them a few race penatlies etc.
.
What annoys me is that they're running an aero part that is angled at 20 degrees (the limit is 5 degrees), but instead of telling them to remove it they're allowed to cover it in tubing.
I admit I'm no designer, but surely an illegal part at 20 degrees (covered in tubing) is better than the 5 degree "standard" part?
Difference is a double diffuser isn't against the rules, Brawn also said in meetings before the start of the season, the rule should be tightened. To remove the loop hole.I amazed that red bull have gotten away with this, but then it's good for the sport to have other winners. I maintain the diffuser on the brawn would have been banned had the fairy tale story not been so high profile.
The presidence for RBR keeping their points could have been set with Ferrari and their bouncy floor. This was also illegal, and once discovered banned, but didn't result in Kimi losing the points from Oz when the car was running with it.