I'll throw the question wider here.
Who here has bought/borrowed (an)other sub of exactly the same kind and tried running two or more?
All this "Think of the cancellation!" talk - have you ever considered that as soon as you put a single sub in a room, that's
exactly what's being introduced anyway? I can understand why you believe multiples will cause more issues but the actual
fact surrounding this is that multiple subs often actually evens out the frequency response in a room for a greater space/number of listeners. Have a look for the paper that Harmann put together a couple of years back examining this very question. The conclusion they came to is that actually 4 subs is the perfect combination to give the greatest number of people the best overall response in most rooms.
Now, I appreciate there's a cost implication here, not to mention a space/WAF one. However, not everyone has these concerns. So, to those that
haven't actually done it, rather than spouting what is the general uninformed consensus from the internet and making assumptions about whoever asks the question, can we please give the facts first and let the OP make a choice?
Taking this slightly further out of the home, how many larger audio systems do you see with just a single sub? What about nightclubs, 'actual' cinemas, gig venues etc. Do you think that suddenly the installation engineers say, "No, we can't have more than one sub, it'll ruin the response. We must spend more money on one better sub."
Me, facetious? Possibly
