You've played 12/13 games more than Spurs in Europe this season? And when you've got the most expensive squad in the history of football, a few extra games is no excuse.
Having the most expensive squad in the history of football also includes every side he's competing against today Frank, not just teams 1000 years agoI'm not sure what prices has anything to do with it - prices are always going up, buying Pogba and Martial cost more than what the majority of the starting XI of the top four 20 years ago
Complete guess but you get the valid point - you cant buy a promising young kid now adays for the cost of 20 Cantona's , even a dodgy defender like Rojo cost 10 times the cost of Bruce did
History means squat - and of course 10 extra games + the cups more than Liverpool and Chelsea ....not to mention the thousands of miles travelling and having 2 days between games rather than 5 is a huge factor (and there seems to be something in playing Thursday / Sunday vs Tues/Wed and Sat , a lot of teams tend to struggle for some reason)
Mourinho always uses a relatively small squad for right or wrong, and seeing as how long its taken to get the 4 he did buy all playing reasonably, I cant see how buying more would help.
Having the most expensive squad in the history of football also includes every side he's competing against today Frank, not just teams 1000 years ago
There is zero excuse for a side with a squad costing 100s of £m's more than the squads they're competing with to be 6th. When you have the resources Mourinho has, you should have a big enough squad to cope with these extra games. And as I asked but you didn't asnwer, have you played 10+ more European games than Spurs? Their squad cost a fraction of Utd's and Spurs currently sit 2nd in the League.