Caporegime
No, he needs to maintain control of himself so as not to endanger another player.
So you think this should have stayed a red then? https://streamable.com/0e54b5
No, he needs to maintain control of himself so as not to endanger another player.
So you think this should have stayed a red then? https://streamable.com/0e54b5
So you think this should have stayed a red then? https://streamable.com/0e54b5
That’s nay the same though is it, that’s on his calf rather than right into his knee. The refs have specific guidance on high studs leading to potential knee injuries or leg breaks.So you think this should have stayed a red then? https://streamable.com/0e54b5
That’s nay the same though is it, that’s on his calf rather than right into his knee. The refs have specific guidance on high studs leading to potential knee injuries or leg breaks.
That’s nay the same though is it, that’s on his calf rather than right into his knee. The refs have specific guidance on high studs leading to potential knee injuries or leg breaks.
Yes, it doesn’t matter though when it comes to that specific rule.I think the bloke was focusing on kicking the ball to be fair, much like the video.
That’s nay the same though is it, that’s on his calf rather than right into his knee. The refs have specific guidance on high studs leading to potential knee injuries or leg breaks.
I would imagine refs would as part of the guidance they receive on what they consider the use of excessive force leading to endangering player safety. I would imagine in that case the ref felt it was a risk of ankle breaking perhaps.Do they? Because a player was sent off for Wales for catching a player in the ankle. Perhaps you have a diagram for where players are allowed to make contact?
I would imagine refs would as part of the guidance they receive on what they consider the use of excessive force leading to endangering player safety. I would imagine in that case the ref felt it was a risk of ankle breaking perhaps.
Don't be daft, they just need to be aware that they shouldn't be putting other players at risk with their play.So in the split second between a ball coming towards them we're expecting defenders to not only remember a visual chart but do the physics calculations to work out where them and their opponents limbs are going to end up in the coming seconds.
So in the split second between a ball coming towards them we're expecting defenders to not only remember a visual chart but do the physics calculations to work out where them and their opponents limbs are going to end up in the coming seconds.
Don't be daft, they just need to be aware that they shouldn't be putting other players at risk with their play.
I never called it reckless.You've literally said it's bad for a player to hit the ankle, fine to hit the calf but then bad to hit the knee. Do you realise how insane that is? How can you possibly call something reckless when it's so unbelievably specific.
Law 12 - Serious Foul Play.Yes you did?