UFO over thames

What I want to know is why are UFO pictures always grainy? I would be ashamed to take a picture as poor as that, even if I was in a hurry.
 
It amazes me how nobody could see it but a camera can take pics of it? i thought our eyes were better than cameras at picking up images around the light spectrum? bizzare

pick up the TV remote, switch on your camrea phone and point the LED at the end at the camera, press a button and look at phone screen. You'll see the LED flashing.

Light visible to our eyes makes up for a tiny amount of the light that is there. We cannot see UV or IR for example, cameras can. I shoot in IR sometimes.


yes indeed, and what proves this is that she said she never saw it when taking the photo, well she couldn't as her eyes would be focusing on what's in the distance , not the windscreen.

Just because something is not in focus, does not mean you cannot see it. It doesnt say if when she took the pics she was looking at the phone screen or not. If she did, and they were not there - but are now, then its just a **** up with the image processing / storage on the camera. But if she didn't look at the screen, and took them (meaning maybe they were visible on the screen) then what you could be looking at is UV / IR.

i'm not saying "OMG ALIENZ!!!11" just trying to point out camera do see more than we do!
 
has anyone not noticed that the person that took the pictures shouldnt have been driving whilst using thier phone. book em!
 
Oh dear.

I dont know who is more of a fool, the person who took the photo or the experts.
 
2307982618_d8d33971de_o.jpg
 
Does anyone else thinks that looks suspiciously like the huge blue backlit gauge of a Mini One that sits in the middle of the dashboard ?
 
Back
Top Bottom